267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32475165)
21. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impressive Performance: New Disposable Digital Ureteroscope Allows for Extreme Lower Pole Access and Use of 365 μm Holmium Laser Fiber.
Leveillee RJ; Kelly EF
J Endourol Case Rep; 2016; 2(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 27579436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.
Dale J; Kaplan AG; Radvak D; Shin R; Ackerman A; Chen T; Scales CD; Ferrandino MN; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 27981862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparing outcomes of single-use vs reusable ureteroscopes: a systematic review and meta analysis.
Belkovsky M; Passerotti CC; Maia RS; de Almeida Artifon EL; Otoch JP; Da Cruz JAS
Urolithiasis; 2024 Feb; 52(1):37. PubMed ID: 38413490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A single center comparative study of two single use digital flexible ureteroscopy in the management of renal stones less than 2 cm.
Zanaty F; Elshazly M; Kandeel H; Salman B
World J Urol; 2023 Mar; 41(3):777-782. PubMed ID: 36700975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Avoiding a Lemon: Performance Consistency of Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
Winship B; Wollin D; Carlos E; Li J; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):127-131. PubMed ID: 30612445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Flexible ureteroscopy: reuse? Or is single use the new direction?
Ventimiglia E; Somani BK; Traxer O
Curr Opin Urol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):113-119. PubMed ID: 31815748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Initial Experience with the New Super Thin Single-use Pusen Flexible Ureteroscope 7.5 Fr in Renal Stones Endoscopic Treatment.
Geavlete B; Ene C; Iordache V; Geavlete P
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2021; 116(3):354-360. PubMed ID: 34191717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of a single-use, digital flexible ureteroscope with a reusable, fiberoptic ureteroscope for management of patients with urolithiasis.
Mourmouris P; Tzelves L; Raptidis G; Berdempes M; Markopoulos T; Dellis G; Siafakas I; Skolarikos A
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2021 Oct; 93(3):326-329. PubMed ID: 34839639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reusable, Single-Use, or Both: A Cost Efficiency Analysis of Flexible Ureterorenoscopes After 983 Cases.
Van Compernolle D; Veys R; Elshout PJ; Beysens M; Van Haute C; De Groote L; Tailly T
J Endourol; 2021 Oct; 35(10):1454-1459. PubMed ID: 33775101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Flexible Ureteroscope Performance between Reusable and Single-Use Models.
Bragaru M; Multescu R; Geavlete P; Popescu R; Geavlete B
J Clin Med; 2023 Jan; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36769740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of a new disposable flexible ureterorenoscope and comparison to an established disposable flexible ureterorenoscope: a prospective, observational study.
Patterson K; Yap LC; Elamin M; Maccraith E; Muheilan M; Sharif A; McGuinness G; Darcy F; Brady C; Hennessey D
Int Urol Nephrol; 2021 May; 53(5):875-881. PubMed ID: 33386582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Efficiency of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower pole stones: disposable flexible ureterorenoscope or reusable flexible ureterorenoscope?
Göger YE; Özkent MS; Kılınç MT; Taşkapu HH; Göger E; Aydın A; Sönmez MG; Karalezli G
World J Urol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):3643-3650. PubMed ID: 33738574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Single-use versus reusable ureterorenoscopes for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): systematic comparative analysis of physical and optical properties in three different devices.
Deininger S; Haberstock L; Kruck S; Neumann E; da Costa IA; Todenhöfer T; Bedke J; Stenzl A; Rausch S
World J Urol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):2059-2063. PubMed ID: 29869701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of Flexible Ureterorenoscope Quality of Vision: An In Vitro Study.
Talso M; Proietti S; Emiliani E; Gallioli A; Dragos L; Orosa A; Servian P; Barreiro A; Giusti G; Montanari E; Somani B; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2018 Jun; 32(6):523-528. PubMed ID: 29562765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: update and perspective in developing countries. A narrative review.
Mazzucchi E; Marchini GS; Berto FCG; Denstedt J; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Torricelli FCM; Battagello CA; Srougi M; Nahas WC
Int Braz J Urol; 2022; 48(3):456-467. PubMed ID: 34786927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices.
Marchini GS; Torricelli FC; Batagello CA; Monga M; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):658-670. PubMed ID: 31397987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Economic Implications of a Reusable Flexible Digital Ureteroscope: A Cost-Benefit Analysis.
Martin CJ; McAdams SB; Abdul-Muhsin H; Lim VM; Nunez-Nateras R; Tyson MD; Humphreys MR
J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):730-735. PubMed ID: 27693449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Benchtop Assessment of a New Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.
Whelan P; Terry RS; Qi R; Ketterman B; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):755-760. PubMed ID: 33207957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The "Body Mass Index" of Flexible Ureteroscopes.
Proietti S; Somani B; Sofer M; Pietropaolo A; Rosso M; Saitta G; Gaboardi F; Traxer O; Giusti G
J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1090-1095. PubMed ID: 28835120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
