These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32475507)

  • 1. Pitfalls in Patch Testing: Minimizing the Risk of Avoidable False-Negative Reactions.
    Ophaug S; Schwarzenberger K
    Dermatol Clin; 2020 Jul; 38(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 32475507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pitfalls in patch testing.
    Elston D; Licata A; Rudner E; Trotter K
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Sep; 11(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 11012008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dupilumab for allergic contact dermatitis and implications for patch testing: Irreconcilable differences.
    Shah P; Milam EC; Lo Sicco KI; Cohen DE
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Sep; 83(3):e215-e216. PubMed ID: 32417419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Positive Occluded Patch Test in the Face of Negative Repeat Open Application Test.
    Goldminz AM; Wald MS; Scheinman PL
    Dermatitis; 2018; 29(3):162-163. PubMed ID: 29762209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Practical Guide to Patch Testing.
    Fonacier L
    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract; 2015; 3(5):669-75. PubMed ID: 26054552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patch tests.
    Lazzarini R; Duarte I; Ferreira AL
    An Bras Dermatol; 2013; 88(6):879-88. PubMed ID: 24474094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pediatric allergic contact dermatitis. Part 2: Patch testing series, procedure, and unique scenarios.
    Neale H; Garza-Mayers AC; Tam I; Yu J
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Feb; 84(2):247-255. PubMed ID: 33217511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Patch Testing Initiative for the Investigation of Allergic Contact Dermatitis in a UK Allergy Practice: A Retrospective Study.
    Watts TJ; Watts S; Thursfield D; Haque R
    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract; 2019 Jan; 7(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 30201159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
    Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Importance of Education When Patch Testing.
    Wu PA
    Dermatol Clin; 2020 Jul; 38(3):351-360. PubMed ID: 32475513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. The European Society of Contact Dermatitis.
    Bruze M; Condé-Salazar L; Goossens A; Kanerva L; White IR
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Nov; 41(5):241-50. PubMed ID: 10554056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Day 4 is better than day 3 for a single patch test reading.
    Todd DJ; Handley J; Metwali M; Allen GE; Burrows D
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Jun; 34(6):402-4. PubMed ID: 8879925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patch Testing Pearls.
    Uyesugi BA; Sheehan MP
    Clin Rev Allergy Immunol; 2019 Feb; 56(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 30269296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The patch test--who should and should not use it and why.
    Sulzberger MB
    Contact Dermatitis; 1975; 1(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 233873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EAACI position paper for practical patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis in children.
    de Waard-van der Spek FB; Darsow U; Mortz CG; Orton D; Worm M; Muraro A; Schmid-Grendelmeier P; Grimalt R; Spiewak R; Rudzeviciene O; Flohr C; Halken S; Fiocchi A; Borrego LM; Oranje AP
    Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2015 Nov; 26(7):598-606. PubMed ID: 26287570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Italian Guidelines in Patch Testing - adapted from the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD).
    Stingeni L; Bianchi L; Hansel K; Corazza M; Gallo R; Guarneri F; Patruno C; Rigano L; Romita P; Pigatto PD; Calzavara-Pinton P;
    G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 2019 Jun; 154(3):227-253. PubMed ID: 30717577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
    Soni BP; Sherertz EF
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Interpretation and relevance of patch testing: false-positive and false-negative test reactions, compound allergy, cross-sensitivity].
    Le Coz CJ; Sasseville D
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2009; 136(8-9):610-6. PubMed ID: 19686897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
    Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single doses of local betamethasone do not suppress allergic patch test reactions to nickel sulfate.
    Molander G; Petman L; Kannas L; Lauerma AI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Apr; 50(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 15186376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.