BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32476596)

  • 1. Predicting RNA SHAPE scores with deep learning.
    Bliss N; Bindewald E; Shapiro BA
    RNA Biol; 2020 Sep; 17(9):1324-1330. PubMed ID: 32476596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. RNA secondary structure prediction using deep learning with thermodynamic integration.
    Sato K; Akiyama M; Sakakibara Y
    Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):941. PubMed ID: 33574226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. sincFold: end-to-end learning of short- and long-range interactions in RNA secondary structure.
    Bugnon LA; Di Persia L; Gerard M; Raad J; Prochetto S; Fenoy E; Chorostecki U; Ariel F; Stegmayer G; Milone DH
    Brief Bioinform; 2024 May; 25(4):. PubMed ID: 38855913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cotranscriptional Kinetic Folding of RNA Secondary Structures Including Pseudoknots.
    Thanh VH; Korpela D; Orponen P
    J Comput Biol; 2021 Sep; 28(9):892-908. PubMed ID: 33902324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating RNA Secondary Structure Folding Free Energy Changes with efn2.
    Zuber J; Mathews DH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2726():1-13. PubMed ID: 38780725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Energy-directed RNA structure prediction.
    Hofacker IL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1097():71-84. PubMed ID: 24639155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling RNA secondary structure folding ensembles using SHAPE mapping data.
    Spasic A; Assmann SM; Bevilacqua PC; Mathews DH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jan; 46(1):314-323. PubMed ID: 29177466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DEBFold: Computational Identification of RNA Secondary Structures for Sequences across Structural Families Using Deep Learning.
    Yang TH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 May; 64(9):3756-3766. PubMed ID: 38648189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phylogenetic and Chemical Probing Information as Soft Constraints in RNA Secondary Structure Prediction.
    von Löhneysen S; Spicher T; Varenyk Y; Yao HT; Lorenz R; Hofacker I; Stadler PF
    J Comput Biol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):549-563. PubMed ID: 38935442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SCFGs in RNA secondary structure prediction RNA secondary structure prediction: a hands-on approach.
    Sükösd Z; Andersen ES; Lyngsø R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1097():143-62. PubMed ID: 24639159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concepts and introduction to RNA bioinformatics.
    Gorodkin J; Hofacker IL; Ruzzo WL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1097():1-31. PubMed ID: 24639152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrating thermodynamic and sequence contexts improves protein-RNA binding prediction.
    Su Y; Luo Y; Zhao X; Liu Y; Peng J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Sep; 15(9):e1007283. PubMed ID: 31483777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RNA independent fragment partition method based on deep learning for RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Zhao Q; Mao Q; Zhao Z; Yuan W; He Q; Sun Q; Yao Y; Fan X
    Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):2861. PubMed ID: 36801945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning the Fastest RNA Folding Path Based on Reinforcement Learning and Monte Carlo Tree Search.
    Mao K; Xiao Y
    Molecules; 2021 Jul; 26(15):. PubMed ID: 34361572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring RNA structural codes with SHAPE chemistry.
    Weeks KM; Mauger DM
    Acc Chem Res; 2011 Dec; 44(12):1280-91. PubMed ID: 21615079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geometric deep learning of RNA structure.
    Townshend RJL; Eismann S; Watkins AM; Rangan R; Karelina M; Das R; Dror RO
    Science; 2021 Aug; 373(6558):1047-1051. PubMed ID: 34446608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. RNA Secondary Structure Modeling Following the IPANEMAP Workflow.
    Allouche D; De Bisschop G; Saaidi A; Hardouin P; du Moutier FL; Ponty Y; Bruno S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2726():85-104. PubMed ID: 38780728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On quantitative effects of RNA shape abstraction.
    Nebel ME; Scheid A
    Theory Biosci; 2009 Nov; 128(4):211-25. PubMed ID: 19756808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel model-based on FCM-LM algorithm for prediction of protein folding rate.
    Liu L; Ma M; Cui J
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2017 Aug; 15(4):1750012. PubMed ID: 28513252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limits in accuracy and a strategy of RNA structure prediction using experimental information.
    Wang J; Williams B; Chirasani VR; Krokhotin A; Das R; Dokholyan NV
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jun; 47(11):5563-5572. PubMed ID: 31106330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.