157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32476596)
41. RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Based on Energy Models.
Akiyama M; Sato K
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2586():89-105. PubMed ID: 36705900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. TRANSAT-- method for detecting the conserved helices of functional RNA structures, including transient, pseudo-knotted and alternative structures.
Wiebe NJ; Meyer IM
PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Jun; 6(6):e1000823. PubMed ID: 20589081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Review of machine learning methods for RNA secondary structure prediction.
Zhao Q; Zhao Z; Fan X; Yuan Z; Mao Q; Yao Y
PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1009291. PubMed ID: 34437528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A range of complex probabilistic models for RNA secondary structure prediction that includes the nearest-neighbor model and more.
Rivas E; Lang R; Eddy SR
RNA; 2012 Feb; 18(2):193-212. PubMed ID: 22194308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. RNA secondary structure prediction using an ensemble of two-dimensional deep neural networks and transfer learning.
Singh J; Hanson J; Paliwal K; Zhou Y
Nat Commun; 2019 Nov; 10(1):5407. PubMed ID: 31776342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. RNA secondary structure prediction with convolutional neural networks.
Saman Booy M; Ilin A; Orponen P
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):58. PubMed ID: 35109787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A New Method to Predict Ion Effects in RNA Folding.
Sun LZ; Chen SJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1632():1-17. PubMed ID: 28730429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. PSRna: Prediction of small RNA secondary structures based on reverse complementary folding method.
Li J; Xu C; Wang L; Liang H; Feng W; Cai Z; Wang Y; Cong W; Liu Y
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2016 Aug; 14(4):1643001. PubMed ID: 27045556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Deep-learning contact-map guided protein structure prediction in CASP13.
Zheng W; Li Y; Zhang C; Pearce R; Mortuza SM; Zhang Y
Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1149-1164. PubMed ID: 31365149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Design of RNAs: comparing programs for inverse RNA folding.
Churkin A; Retwitzer MD; Reinharz V; Ponty Y; Waldispühl J; Barash D
Brief Bioinform; 2018 Mar; 19(2):350-358. PubMed ID: 28049135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Research on folding diversity in statistical learning methods for RNA secondary structure prediction.
Zhu Y; Xie Z; Li Y; Zhu M; Chen YP
Int J Biol Sci; 2018; 14(8):872-882. PubMed ID: 29989089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Recent advances in RNA folding.
Fallmann J; Will S; Engelhardt J; Grüning B; Backofen R; Stadler PF
J Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 261():97-104. PubMed ID: 28690134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Predicting RNA Secondary Structure Using In Vitro and In Vivo Data.
Delli Ponti R; Tartaglia GG
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2404():43-52. PubMed ID: 34694602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Prediction of RNA secondary structure by free energy minimization.
Mathews DH; Turner DH
Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2006 Jun; 16(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 16713706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Improving RNA secondary structure prediction with structure mapping data.
Sloma MF; Mathews DH
Methods Enzymol; 2015; 553():91-114. PubMed ID: 25726462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Thermodynamic matchers: strengthening the significance of RNA folding energies.
Höchsmann T; Höchsmann M; Giegerich R
Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2006; ():111-21. PubMed ID: 17369630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Predicting RNA secondary structure via adaptive deep recurrent neural networks with energy-based filter.
Lu W; Tang Y; Wu H; Huang H; Fu Q; Qiu J; Li H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 25):684. PubMed ID: 31874602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A Guide to Computational Cotranscriptional Folding Featuring the SRP RNA.
Badelt S; Lorenz R
Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2726():315-346. PubMed ID: 38780737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Characterizing RNA structures in vitro and in vivo with selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension sequencing (SHAPE-Seq).
Watters KE; Yu AM; Strobel EJ; Settle AH; Lucks JB
Methods; 2016 Jul; 103():34-48. PubMed ID: 27064082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Identifying good predictions of RNA secondary structure.
Nebel ME
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2004; ():423-34. PubMed ID: 14992522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
