143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32476744)
41. Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal.
Granata V; Caruso D; Grassi R; Cappabianca S; Reginelli A; Rizzati R; Masselli G; Golfieri R; Rengo M; Regge D; Lo Re G; Pradella S; Fusco R; Faggioni L; Laghi A; Miele V; Neri E; Coppola F
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Apr; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 33925250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Improvement in quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting with a standardized proforma--a comparative study.
Beattie GC; McAdam TK; Elliott S; Sloan JM; Irwin ST
Colorectal Dis; 2003 Nov; 5(6):558-62. PubMed ID: 14617240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The awareness of radiologists for the presence of lateral lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a single-centre, retrospective cohort study.
Sluckin TC; Rooker YFL; Kol SQ; Hazen SJA; Tuynman JB; Stoker J; Tanis PJ; Horsthuis K; Kusters M
Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):6637-6645. PubMed ID: 35581479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Impact of a Structured Reporting Template on Adherence to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 and on the Diagnostic Performance of Prostate MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Shaish H; Feltus W; Steinman J; Hecht E; Wenske S; Ahmed F
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 May; 15(5):749-754. PubMed ID: 29506919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Rectal cancer staging: Multidetector-row computed tomography diagnostic accuracy in assessment of mesorectal fascia invasion.
Ippolito D; Drago SG; Franzesi CT; Fior D; Sironi S
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 22(20):4891-900. PubMed ID: 27239115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [The importance of pre-operative MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion in the treatment of rectal carcinoma].
Hemmelová B; Bohatá Š; Kyclová J; Kala Z; Penka I
Rozhl Chir; 2018; 97(4):172-175. PubMed ID: 29726263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Structured versus non-structured reporting of pelvic MRI for ileal pouch evaluation: clarity and effectiveness.
Ginocchio LA; Dane B; Smereka PN; Megibow AJ; Remzi FH; Esen E; Huang C
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Sep; 48(9):2978-2985. PubMed ID: 36871233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effect of Template Reporting of Brain MRIs for Multiple Sclerosis on Report Thoroughness and Neurologist-Rated Quality: Results of a Prospective Quality Improvement Project.
Dickerson E; Davenport MS; Syed F; Stuve O; Cohen JA; Rinker JR; Goldman MD; Segal BM; Foerster BR;
J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Mar; 14(3):371-379.e1. PubMed ID: 27932248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting.
Beets-Tan RGH; Lambregts DMJ; Maas M; Bipat S; Barbaro B; Curvo-Semedo L; Fenlon HM; Gollub MJ; Gourtsoyianni S; Halligan S; Hoeffel C; Kim SH; Laghi A; Maier A; Rafaelsen SR; Stoker J; Taylor SA; Torkzad MR; Blomqvist L
Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1465-1475. PubMed ID: 29043428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Development of a synoptic MRI report for primary rectal cancer.
Spiegle G; Leon-Carlyle M; Schmocker S; Fruitman M; Milot L; Gagliardi AR; Smith AJ; McLeod RS; Kennedy ED
Implement Sci; 2009 Dec; 4():79. PubMed ID: 19954526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A structured approach to reporting rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
Tarulli E; Thipphavong S; Jhaveri K
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):3002-11. PubMed ID: 26239398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Do MRI reports contain adequate preoperative staging information for end users to make appropriate treatment decisions for rectal cancer?
Al-Sukhni E; Messenger DE; Charles Victor J; McLeod RS; Kennedy ED
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Apr; 20(4):1148-55. PubMed ID: 23143592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Current controversies in TNM for the radiological staging of rectal cancer and how to deal with them: results of a global online survey and multidisciplinary expert consensus.
Lambregts DMJ; Bogveradze N; Blomqvist LK; Fokas E; Garcia-Aguilar J; Glimelius B; Gollub MJ; Konishi T; Marijnen CAM; Nagtegaal ID; Nilsson PJ; Perez RO; Snaebjornsson P; Taylor SA; Tolan DJM; Valentini V; West NP; Wolthuis A; Lahaye MJ; Maas M; Beets GL; Beets-Tan RGH
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jul; 32(7):4991-5003. PubMed ID: 35254485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. SAR user guide to the rectal MR synoptic report (primary staging).
Kassam Z; Lang R; Bates DDB; Chang KJ; Fraum TJ; Friedman KA; Golia Pernicka JS; Gollub MJ; Harisinghani M; Khatri G; Lall C; Lee S; Magnetta M; Nougaret S; Paspulati RM; Paroder V; Shaish H; Kim DH;
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Jan; 48(1):186-199. PubMed ID: 35754053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Training of radiology specialists in local staging of primary rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective intervention study exploring the impact of various educational elements on the interpretive performance.
Bregendahl S; Bondeven P; Grønborg TK; Brown G; Laurberg S; Pedersen BG
BMJ Open Qual; 2022 Aug; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 35944932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) and tumor deposits (TDs) on distant metastasis and long-term survival after surgery for stage III rectal cancer: a retrospective study grouped based on the relationship between the bottom of the tumor and peritoneal reflection.
Jiang D; Fan X; Chen K; Li H; Dai Y; Sun N; Li Z
J Gastrointest Oncol; 2023 Apr; 14(2):963-979. PubMed ID: 37201089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Significance of MRI in rectal carcinoma therapy optimization - correlation of preoperative T- and N-staging with definitive histopathological findings.
Danihel L; Danihel L; Rajcok M; Mosna K; Belan V; Varga I; Schnorrer M
Neoplasma; 2019 May; 66(3):494-498. PubMed ID: 30793609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Synoptic Reporting for Pretreatment CT Examination in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Impact on Documentation of Disease Sites and Physician Satisfaction.
Andrieu PC; Nikolovski I; Juluru K; Sadowski E; Gangai N; Zheng J; Capanu M; Praiss AM; Nougaret S; Shinagare AB; Ma W; Torrisi JM; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Lakhman Y;
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Dec; 221(6):760-772. PubMed ID: 37436033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Intra- and interobserver agreement of rectal cancer staging with MRI.
Kilickap G; Dolek BA; Ercan K
Acta Radiol; 2023 May; 64(5):1747-1754. PubMed ID: 36476121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
