These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3247675)
21. Peer review time: how late is late in a small medical journal? Kljaković-Gaspić M; Hren D; Marusić A; Marusić M Arch Med Res; 2003; 34(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 14602513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Peer review in a post-eprints world: a proposal. Till JE J Med Internet Res; 2000; 2(3):E14. PubMed ID: 11720937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Peer review is essential for both print and electronic publications. Weller AC MedGenMed; 2001 Nov; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 11965200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Peer review: a legal update with a summary of state laws on immunity. Suber DG Conn Med; 1982 Nov; 46(11):651-66. PubMed ID: 7172669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. No crisis in supply of peer reviewers. Vines T; Rieseberg L; Smith H Nature; 2010 Dec; 468(7327):1041. PubMed ID: 21179154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. NIH gathers information on peer review. Physiologist; 2007 Apr; 50(2):68. PubMed ID: 17477020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Only you can make the difference. Peer review needs you. Seitzinger DB Ohio Med; 1991 Jun; 87(6):295, 298, 303. PubMed ID: 1861835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Peer review in a competitive market. Miller JW Ala J Med Sci; 1986 Jan; 23(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 3513656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. "Outing" peer review: medical editors scrutinize the value of secrecy. Vanchieri C J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Nov; 89(21):1568-9. PubMed ID: 9362150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Antitrust's recent attack on the peer review practitioner: is the Health Care Quality Improvement Act a viable remedy? Rifkin AM; Evans GE; Hall GD Md Med J; 1990 Jan; 39(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 2308484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The new radiation therapy clinical practice: the emerging role of clinical peer review for radiation therapists and medical dosimetrists. Adams RD; Marks LB; Pawlicki T; Hayman J; Church J Med Dosim; 2010; 35(4):320-3. PubMed ID: 21055612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Peer review in the university hospital setting. Wirtschafter DD Ala J Med Sci; 1986 Jan; 23(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 3456729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Lux and veritas: approaching the thorny process of peer-review and "peer-review" 2011. Apuzzo ML World Neurosurg; 2011; 76(1-2):1. PubMed ID: 21839925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Peer review in medical publishing--how to streamline the system. Kochar MS Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1984 Oct; 4(9):6. PubMed ID: 10269285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Trends in complaints against the medical profession: an analysis of the work of the SMS commission on Mediation and Peer Review. Long JP Wis Med J; 1993 May; 92(5):249-51. PubMed ID: 8328161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Peer review of case management skills in clinical veterinary medicine--is it time? Stark DR; Pion PD J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1997 Dec; 211(11):1358-61. PubMed ID: 9394879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Implementation of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the future of peer review. Trostorff DL Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(2):23-31. PubMed ID: 10106574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Peer review: the success of headache depends on us! Taylor FR Headache; 2009 Apr; 49 Suppl 2():S66-9. PubMed ID: 19356163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]