These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
12. Triple lead cephalic versus subclavian vein approach in cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation. Vogler J; Geisler A; Gosau N; Hakmi S; Willems S; Rassaf T; Wakili R; Kaya E Sci Rep; 2018 Dec; 8(1):17709. PubMed ID: 30532064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unusual Venous Access for Device Implantation. Al-Sadawi M; Budzikowski AS Am J Case Rep; 2019 Oct; 20():1482-1486. PubMed ID: 31591374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimized Axillary Vein Technique versus Subclavian Vein Technique in Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Implantation: A Randomized Controlled Study. Liu P; Zhou YF; Yang P; Gao YS; Zhao GR; Ren SY; Li XL Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Nov; 129(22):2647-2651. PubMed ID: 27823994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cephalic vein cutdown and venography technique to facilitate pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation. Tse HF; Lau CP; Leung SK Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Apr; 24(4 Pt 1):469-73. PubMed ID: 11341084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided axillary/subclavian venous approaches for pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation: a randomized study. Liccardo M; Nocerino P; Gaia S; Ciardiello C J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Mar; 51(2):153-160. PubMed ID: 29335840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement. Di Carlo I; Barbagallo F; Toro A; Sofia M; Lombardo R; Cordio S Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):570-3. PubMed ID: 15889215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective randomized comparison of the safety and effectiveness of placement of endocardial pacemaker and defibrillator leads using the extrathoracic subclavian vein guided by contrast venography versus the cephalic approach. Calkins H; Ramza BM; Brinker J; Atiga W; Donahue K; Nsah E; Taylor E; Halperin H; Lawrence JH; Tomaselli G; Berger RD Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Apr; 24(4 Pt 1):456-64. PubMed ID: 11341082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low incidence of complications after cephalic vein cutdown for pacemaker lead implantation in children weighing less than 10 kilograms: A single-center experience with long-term follow-up. Kircanski B; Vasic D; Savic D; Stojanov P Heart Rhythm; 2015 Aug; 12(8):1820-6. PubMed ID: 25916570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]