These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32478404)

  • 1. The Effects of Microfluidic Sperm Sorting, Density Gradient and Swim-up Methods on Semen Oxidation Reduction Potential.
    Gode F; Gürbüz AS; Tamer B; Pala I; Isik AZ
    Urol J; 2020 May; 17(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 32478404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microfluidic sorting selects sperm for clinical use with reduced DNA damage compared to density gradient centrifugation with swim-up in split semen samples.
    Quinn MM; Jalalian L; Ribeiro S; Ona K; Demirci U; Cedars MI; Rosen MP
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1388-1393. PubMed ID: 30007319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential impact of four sperm preparation techniques on sperm motility, morphology, DNA fragmentation, acrosome status, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial activity: A prospective study.
    Raad G; Bakos HW; Bazzi M; Mourad Y; Fakih F; Shayya S; Mchantaf L; Fakih C
    Andrology; 2021 Sep; 9(5):1549-1559. PubMed ID: 33999521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microfluidic sperm sorting selects a subpopulation of high-quality sperm with a higher potential for fertilization.
    Sheibak N; Amjadi F; Shamloo A; Zarei F; Zandieh Z
    Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 39(5):902-911. PubMed ID: 38461455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Isolation of motile spermatozoa from semen samples using microfluidics.
    Schuster TG; Cho B; Keller LM; Takayama S; Smith GD
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2003; 7(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 12930579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Live motile sperm sorting device for enhanced sperm-fertilization competency: comparative analysis with density-gradient centrifugation and microfluidic sperm sorting.
    Hsu CT; Lee CI; Lin FS; Wang FZ; Chang HC; Wang TE; Huang CC; Tsao HM; Lee MS; Agarwal A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2023 Aug; 40(8):1855-1864. PubMed ID: 37300647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semen preparation methods and sperm apoptosis: swim-up versus gradient-density centrifugation technique.
    Ricci G; Perticarari S; Boscolo R; Montico M; Guaschino S; Presani G
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb; 91(2):632-8. PubMed ID: 18206147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative efficacy of density gradient and swim-up methods of semen preparation in intrauterine insemination cycles.
    Butt F; Chohan MA
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):932-7. PubMed ID: 27524522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between a two-layer discontinuous Percoll gradient and swim-up for sperm preparation on normal and abnormal semen samples.
    Chen SU; Ho HN; Chen HF; Chao KH; Lin HR; Huang SC; Lee TY; Yang YS
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Nov; 12(10):698-703. PubMed ID: 8624426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study on density gradients and swim-up preparation techniques utilizing neat and cryopreserved spermatozoa.
    Allamaneni SS; Agarwal A; Rama S; Ranganathan P; Sharma RK
    Asian J Androl; 2005 Mar; 7(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 15685358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.
    Boomsma CM; Heineman MJ; Cohlen BJ; Farquhar C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD004507. PubMed ID: 15266536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of four methods of sperm preparation on the motile concentration, morphology, and acrosome status of recovered sperm from normal semen samples.
    Brandeis VT; Manuel MT
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1993 Aug; 10(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 8019090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combination of direct swim-up technique and discontinuous Percoll gradient centrifugation for sperm preparation of oligoasthenozoospermic samples.
    Chen SU; Ho HN; Chen HF; Chao KH; Wu MY; Chen CD; Huang SC; Lee TY; Yang YS
    Arch Androl; 1996; 37(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 8886259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved sperm kinematics in semen samples collected after 2 h versus 4-7 days of ejaculation abstinence.
    Alipour H; Van Der Horst G; Christiansen OB; Dardmeh F; Jørgensen N; Nielsen HI; Hnida C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1364-1372. PubMed ID: 28531319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of semen processing technique on human sperm DNA integrity.
    Zini A; Finelli A; Phang D; Jarvi K
    Urology; 2000 Dec; 56(6):1081-4. PubMed ID: 11113773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A methodological validation of an easy one-step swimout semen preparation procedure for selecting DNA fragmentation-free spermatozoa for ICSI.
    De Gheselle S; Deroose A; Stevens J; Hiel M; Tilleman K
    Andrologia; 2020 Dec; 52(11):e13852. PubMed ID: 33113276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sperm-preparation techniques for men with normal and abnormal semen analysis. A comparison.
    Erel CT; Senturk LM; Irez T; Ercan L; Elter K; Colgar U; Ertungealp E
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):917-22. PubMed ID: 11127104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of semen processing on the generation of reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial membrane potential of human spermatozoa.
    Li Z; Zhou Y; Liu R; Lin H; Liu W; Xiao W; Lin Q
    Andrologia; 2012 Jun; 44(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 21729130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effects of a microfluidic sperm sorter on sperm routine parameters and DNA integrity].
    Wang W; Liang GT; Peng YY; Liu DY; Zhou XM
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2011 Apr; 17(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 21548204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spermatozoa isolation with Felix™ outperforms conventional density gradient centrifugation preparation in selecting cells with low DNA damage.
    Villeneuve P; Saez F; Hug E; Chorfa A; Guiton R; Schubert B; Force A; Drevet JR
    Andrology; 2023 Nov; 11(8):1593-1604. PubMed ID: 36629014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.