223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32479592)
1. Recommendations to enhance rigor and reproducibility in biomedical research.
Brito JJ; Li J; Moore JH; Greene CS; Nogoy NA; Garmire LX; Mangul S
Gigascience; 2020 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 32479592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing.
Prager EM; Chambers KE; Plotkin JL; McArthur DL; Bandrowski AE; Bansal N; Martone ME; Bergstrom HC; Bespalov A; Graf C
J Neurosci Res; 2019 Apr; 97(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 30506706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Challenges and recommendations to improve the installability and archival stability of omics computational tools.
Mangul S; Mosqueiro T; Abdill RJ; Duong D; Mitchell K; Sarwal V; Hill B; Brito J; Littman RJ; Statz B; Lam AK; Dayama G; Grieneisen L; Martin LS; Flint J; Eskin E; Blekhman R
PLoS Biol; 2019 Jun; 17(6):e3000333. PubMed ID: 31220077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing.
Prager EM; Chambers KE; Plotkin JL; McArthur DL; Bandrowski AE; Bansal N; Martone ME; Bergstrom HC; Bespalov A; Graf C
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2019 Feb; 2(1):e1150. PubMed ID: 32721132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeat: a framework to assess empirical reproducibility in biomedical research.
McIntosh LD; Juehne A; Vitale CRH; Liu X; Alcoser R; Lukas JC; Evanoff B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):143. PubMed ID: 28923006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Modeling Standards, Software, and Initiatives Support Reproducibility in Systems Biology and Systems Medicine.
Waltemath D; Wolkenhauer O
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Oct; 63(10):1999-2006. PubMed ID: 27295645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing.
Prager EM; Chambers KE; Plotkin JL; McArthur DL; Bandrowski AE; Bansal N; Martone ME; Bergstrom HC; Bespalov A; Graf C
Brain Behav; 2019 Jan; 9(1):e01141. PubMed ID: 30506879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survey on Scientific Shared Resource Rigor and Reproducibility.
Knudtson KL; Carnahan RH; Hegstad-Davies RL; Fisher NC; Hicks B; Lopez PA; Meyn SM; Mische SM; Weis-Garcia F; White LD; Sol-Church K
J Biomol Tech; 2019 Sep; 30(3):36-44. PubMed ID: 31452645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving the trustworthiness, usefulness, and ethics of biomedical research through an innovative and comprehensive institutional initiative.
Strech D; Weissgerber T; Dirnagl U;
PLoS Biol; 2020 Feb; 18(2):e3000576. PubMed ID: 32045410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analytical code sharing practices in biomedical research.
Sharma NK; Ayyala R; Deshpande D; Patel YM; Munteanu V; Ciorba D; Fiscutean A; Vahed M; Sarkar A; Guo R; Moore A; Darci-Maher N; Nogoy NA; Abedalthagafi MS; Mangul S
bioRxiv; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37609176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Review of the Scientific Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency Studies Conducted by the ABRF Research Groups.
Mische SM; Fisher NC; Meyn SM; Sol-Church K; Hegstad-Davies RL; Weis-Garcia F; Adams M; Ashton JM; Delventhal KM; Dragon JA; Holmes L; Jagtap P; Kubow KE; Mason CE; Palmblad M; Searle BC; Turck CW; Knudtson KL
J Biomol Tech; 2020 Apr; 31(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 31969795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide.
Casadevall A; Fang FC
mBio; 2016 Nov; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 27834205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CODECHECK: an Open Science initiative for the independent execution of computations underlying research articles during peer review to improve reproducibility.
Nüst D; Eglen SJ
F1000Res; 2021; 10():253. PubMed ID: 34367614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility in Computational Neuroscience Models and Simulations.
McDougal RA; Bulanova AS; Lytton WW
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Oct; 63(10):2021-35. PubMed ID: 27046845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term preservation of biomedical research data.
Navale V; McAuliffe M
F1000Res; 2018; 7():1353. PubMed ID: 30356367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validating the knowledge bank approach for personalized prediction of survival in acute myeloid leukemia: a reproducibility study.
Xu Y; Mansmann U
Hum Genet; 2022 Sep; 141(9):1467-1480. PubMed ID: 35429300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Establishing Institutional Scores With the Rigor and Transparency Index: Large-scale Analysis of Scientific Reporting Quality.
Menke J; Eckmann P; Ozyurt IB; Roelandse M; Anderson N; Grethe J; Gamst A; Bandrowski A
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jun; 24(6):e37324. PubMed ID: 35759334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recommendations for open data science.
Gymrek M; Farjoun Y
Gigascience; 2016; 5():22. PubMed ID: 27195107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Open science, reproducibility, and transparency in ecology.
Powers SM; Hampton SE
Ecol Appl; 2019 Jan; 29(1):e01822. PubMed ID: 30362295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Publishers' Responsibilities in Promoting Data Quality and Reproducibility.
Hrynaszkiewicz I
Handb Exp Pharmacol; 2020; 257():319-348. PubMed ID: 31691858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
