These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3248271)

  • 1. The direct resin inlay: clinical protocol.
    Candio SJ
    Compendium; 1988 Apr; 9(4):292, 294, 297-8 passim. PubMed ID: 3248271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inlay shading effect on the photopolymerization kinetic of a dental composite material used as bonding system in an indirect restoration technique.
    Simeone M; Lanza A; Rengo S; Aversa R; Apicella D; Apicella A
    Dent Mater; 2005 Aug; 21(8):689-94. PubMed ID: 15963562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Indirectly prepared inlay/onlay composite restoration (II)].
    Geurtsen W; Hullmann U; Gockel HW
    Quintessenz; 1988 Oct; 39(10):1675-83. PubMed ID: 3252310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of gap size and cement type on gingival microleakage in Class V resin composite inlays.
    Browning WD; Safirstein J
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Aug; 28(8):541-4. PubMed ID: 9477882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental amalgam--what are the alternatives?
    Tyas MJ
    Int Dent J; 1994 Aug; 44(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 7822054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Indirectly prepared inlay/onlay composite restoration (I)].
    Geurtsen W; Hullmann U; Gockel HW
    Quintessenz; 1988 Sep; 39(9):1501-9. PubMed ID: 3253771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cast partial restorations: outdated!].
    Creugers NH
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2004 Nov; 111(11):442-4. PubMed ID: 15626132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wear of composite resin inlays and antagonistic enamel.
    Young HL; Suzuki S
    Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 10477999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct-indirect resin restoration: a case report of acceptable compromise.
    Liebenberg WH
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1997 Apr; 63(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 9125842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chairside-fabricated indirect resin restorations: a new articulated technique.
    Liebenberg WH
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Aug; 28(8):499-507. PubMed ID: 9477877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The composite resin inlay as an alternative to amalgam.
    Martin FE
    N Z Dent J; 1991 Apr; 87(388):43-5. PubMed ID: 1896140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Curing composite resin at elevated temperatures.
    Terry DA
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Sep; 18(8):495-8. PubMed ID: 17061686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Gold partial restorations - quo vadis?].
    Pameijer JH
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2004 Nov; 111(11):445-6. PubMed ID: 15626133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developing an intracoronal restoration with indirect composite resin: Part 1.
    Terry DA; Leinfelder KF; Maragos C
    Dent Today; 2004 Dec; 23(12):78-80, 82, 84-5; quiz 85, 98. PubMed ID: 15633828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Placement technique for direct posterior composite restorations.
    Javaheri DS
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 13(3):195-200; quiz 202. PubMed ID: 11360766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developments in indirect resin composite materials.
    Leinfelder KF
    Dent Today; 2000 Mar; 19(3):58-61. PubMed ID: 12522859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.