These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites. Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inlay shading effect on the photopolymerization kinetic of a dental composite material used as bonding system in an indirect restoration technique. Simeone M; Lanza A; Rengo S; Aversa R; Apicella D; Apicella A Dent Mater; 2005 Aug; 21(8):689-94. PubMed ID: 15963562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface. Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of gap size and cement type on gingival microleakage in Class V resin composite inlays. Browning WD; Safirstein J Quintessence Int; 1997 Aug; 28(8):541-4. PubMed ID: 9477882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dental amalgam--what are the alternatives? Tyas MJ Int Dent J; 1994 Aug; 44(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 7822054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The composite resin inlay as an alternative to amalgam. Martin FE N Z Dent J; 1991 Apr; 87(388):43-5. PubMed ID: 1896140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Curing composite resin at elevated temperatures. Terry DA Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Sep; 18(8):495-8. PubMed ID: 17061686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]