These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32483344)

  • 1. Dissociable mechanisms govern when and how strongly reward attributes affect decisions.
    Maier SU; Raja Beharelle A; Polanía R; Ruff CC; Hare TA
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Sep; 4(9):949-963. PubMed ID: 32483344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision processes in temporal discrimination.
    Balcı F; Simen P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():157-68. PubMed ID: 24726447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Salience-Driven Value Construction for Adaptive Choice under Risk.
    Spitmaan M; Chu E; Soltani A
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 39(26):5195-5209. PubMed ID: 31023835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The integration of social influence and reward: Computational approaches and neural evidence.
    Tomlin D; Nedic A; Prentice DA; Holmes P; Cohen JD
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 17(4):784-808. PubMed ID: 28540647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A dynamic computational model of gaze and choice in multi-attribute decisions.
    Yang X; Krajbich I
    Psychol Rev; 2023 Jan; 130(1):52-70. PubMed ID: 35025570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual and categorical decision making: goal-relevant representation of two domains at different levels of abstraction.
    Shankar S; Kayser AS
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jun; 117(6):2088-2103. PubMed ID: 28250149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weighting on waiting: Willpower and attribute weighting models of decision making.
    Harris A
    Behav Brain Sci; 2021 Apr; 44():e38. PubMed ID: 33899707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Confluence of Timing and Reward Biases in Perceptual Decision-Making Dynamics.
    Shinn M; Ehrlich DB; Lee D; Murray JD; Seo H
    J Neurosci; 2020 Sep; 40(38):7326-7342. PubMed ID: 32839233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Value-based attentional capture influences context-dependent decision-making.
    Itthipuripat S; Cha K; Rangsipat N; Serences JT
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 114(1):560-9. PubMed ID: 25995350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eye tracking and pupillometry are indicators of dissociable latent decision processes.
    Cavanagh JF; Wiecki TV; Kochar A; Frank MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Aug; 143(4):1476-88. PubMed ID: 24548281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do humans produce the speed-accuracy trade-off that maximizes reward rate?
    Bogacz R; Hu PT; Holmes PJ; Cohen JD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):863-91. PubMed ID: 19746300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reactivation of Reward-Related Patterns from Single Past Episodes Supports Memory-Based Decision Making.
    Wimmer GE; Büchel C
    J Neurosci; 2016 Mar; 36(10):2868-80. PubMed ID: 26961943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-attribute, multi-alternative models of choice: Choice, reaction time, and process tracing.
    Cohen AL; Kang N; Leise TL
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Nov; 98():45-72. PubMed ID: 28843070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying the time for accurate EEG decoding of single value-based decisions.
    Tzovara A; Chavarriaga R; De Lucia M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jul; 250():114-25. PubMed ID: 25291525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reward and avoidance learning in the context of aversive environments and possible implications for depressive symptoms.
    Sebold M; Garbusow M; Jetzschmann P; Schad DJ; Nebe S; Schlagenhauf F; Heinz A; Rapp M; Romanczuk-Seiferth N
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2019 Aug; 236(8):2437-2449. PubMed ID: 31254091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Salience signals in the right temporoparietal junction facilitate value-based decisions.
    Kahnt T; Tobler PN
    J Neurosci; 2013 Jan; 33(3):863-9. PubMed ID: 23325225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Payoff Information Biases a Fast Guess Process in Perceptual Decision Making under Deadline Pressure: Evidence from Behavior, Evoked Potentials, and Quantitative Model Comparison.
    Noorbaloochi S; Sharon D; McClelland JL
    J Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 35(31):10989-1011. PubMed ID: 26245962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The neural substrates of social influence on decision making.
    Tomlin D; Nedic A; Prentice DA; Holmes P; Cohen JD
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52630. PubMed ID: 23326346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An attentional drift diffusion model over binary-attribute choice.
    Fisher G
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():34-45. PubMed ID: 28646751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decomposing bias in different types of simple decisions.
    White CN; Poldrack RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):385-398. PubMed ID: 24245536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.