These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32483661)

  • 41. Age-related effects of attentional and oculomotor capture by onsets and color singletons as a function of experience.
    Colcombe AM; Kramer AF; Irwin DE; Peterson MS; Colcombe S; Hahn S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Jun; 113(2):205-25. PubMed ID: 12750049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set.
    Turatto M; Galfano G
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):286-97. PubMed ID: 11281103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The contribution of color to attention capture effects during search for onset targets.
    Goller F; Ditye T; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):789-807. PubMed ID: 26742497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Target-uncertainty effects in attentional capture: color-singleton set or multiple attentional control settings?
    Folk CL; Anderson BA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Jun; 17(3):421-6. PubMed ID: 20551369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Testing the top-down contingent capture of attention for abrupt-onset cues: Evidence from cue-elicited N2pc.
    Goller F; Schoeberl T; Ansorge U
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Nov; 57(11):e13655. PubMed ID: 32790903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Attentional capture by size singletons is determined by top-down search goals.
    Kiss M; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Jun; 48(6):784-7. PubMed ID: 21539576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Attentional capture by irrelevant color singletons.
    Johnson JD; Hutchison KA; Trammell Neill W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Aug; 27(4):841-7. PubMed ID: 11518147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. No identification of abrupt onsets that capture attention: evidence against a unified model of spatial attention.
    Maxwell JW; Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jul; 85(5):2119-2135. PubMed ID: 32500242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2360-2378. PubMed ID: 31993978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A new technique for estimating the probability of attentional capture.
    Rigsby TJ; Stilwell BT; Ruthruff E; Gaspelin N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):543-559. PubMed ID: 36624200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Perceptual grouping allows for attention to cover noncontiguous locations and suppress capture from nearby locations.
    Kerzel D; Born S; Schönhammer J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1362-70. PubMed ID: 22428670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons.
    Belopolsky AV; Zwaan L; Theeuwes J; Kramer AF
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Oct; 14(5):934-8. PubMed ID: 18087962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. It's under control: top-down search strategies can override attentional capture.
    Leber AB; Egeth HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 16724780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Top-down matching singleton cues have no edge over top-down matching nonsingletons in spatial cueing.
    Schoeberl T; Goller F; Ansorge U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):241-249. PubMed ID: 29959614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The influence of relevant and irrelevant stereoscopic depth cues: Depth information does not always capture attention.
    Plewan T; Rinkenauer G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1996-2007. PubMed ID: 30030691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Capturing attention is not that simple: different mechanisms for stimulus-driven and contingent capture.
    Liao HI; Yeh SL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1703-14. PubMed ID: 24037596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task.
    Wienrich C; Janczyk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. On the limits of top-down control of visual selection.
    Theeuwes J; Van der Burg E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2092-103. PubMed ID: 21744177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.