191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32484135)
1. Neuroscience-based Psychiatric Assessments of Criminal Responsibility: Beyond Self-Report?
Meynen G
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2020 Jul; 29(3):446-458. PubMed ID: 32484135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant's Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS).
Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Carabellese F; Ferracuti S
Transl Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 9(1):278. PubMed ID: 31699969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A confusion of tongues: competence, insanity, psychiatry, and the law.
Gutheil TG
Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jun; 50(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 10375145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors related to bias in forensic psychiatric assessments in criminal matters: A systematic review.
Meyer LF; Valença AM
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 75():101681. PubMed ID: 33712325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using Technology to Improve the Objectivity of Criminal Responsibility Evaluations.
Vitacco MJ; Gottfried ED; Batastini AB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 29618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The insanity defense: a difficult necessity.
McGrath JJ
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Jan; 36(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 3967874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Forensic psychiatry in Kuwait - characterization of forensic psychiatry patients evaluated over year duration in the only available forensic psychiatry unit.
Alhumoud A; Zahid M; Ibrahim S; Syed T; Naguy A
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 60():12-16. PubMed ID: 30217325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Criminal responsibility evaluations: Benchmarking in different countries.
Pouls C; Jeandarme I; Al-Taiar H; Bradford J; Canton W; Kristiansson M; Thibaut F; Verreyt V; Konrad N
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 81():101775. PubMed ID: 35066422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying factors associated with criminal responsibility by analyzing court trial verdicts.
Shiina A; Sato A; Iyo M; Igarashi Y
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 77():101702. PubMed ID: 33962349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The insanity defense: the case for abolition.
Perr IN
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Jan; 36(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 3967873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Competency to stand trial and defendants who lack insight into their mental illness.
Reisner AD; Piel J; Makey M
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 23503181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neuroscience in forensic psychiatry: From responsibility to dangerousness. Ethical and legal implications of using neuroscience for dangerousness assessments.
Gkotsi GM; Gasser J
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 46():58-67. PubMed ID: 27209602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The insanity defense on trial.
Stone AA
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Aug; 33(8):636-40. PubMed ID: 7118098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychiatric aspects of criminal responsibility: insanity and mitigation.
Burrows M; Reid WH
J Psychiatr Pract; 2011 Nov; 17(6):429-31. PubMed ID: 22108401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The factors associated with forensic psychiatrists' decisions in criminal responsibility and social dangerousness evaluations.
Mandarelli G; Carabellese F; Felthous AR; Parmigiani G; Del Casale A; Catanesi R; Montalbò D; Ferracuti S
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101503. PubMed ID: 31706410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mental disorder and legal responsibility: the relevance of stages of decision making.
Kalis A; Meynen G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(6):601-8. PubMed ID: 24694295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a new instrument to guide and support insanity evaluations: the defendant's insanity assessment support scale (DIASS).
Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Roma P; Ferracuti S
Transl Psychiatry; 2022 Mar; 12(1):115. PubMed ID: 35318308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics associated with criminal responsibility assessment outcomes among women in Central Canada.
Hardman MP; Nijdam-Jones A; Demetrioff S
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2024; 94():101988. PubMed ID: 38735266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
Meynen G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The importance of the patients deemed not guilty by reason of insanity for the psychiatric reform.
Douzenis A
Psychiatriki; 2016; 27(3):165-168. PubMed ID: 27837570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
