193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32484221)
1. Beware of the generic machine learning-based scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening.
Shen C; Hu Y; Wang Z; Zhang X; Pang J; Wang G; Zhong H; Xu L; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32484221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy or novelty: what can we gain from target-specific machine-learning-based scoring functions in virtual screening?
Shen C; Weng G; Zhang X; Leung EL; Yao X; Pang J; Chai X; Li D; Wang E; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33418562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Topology-Based and Conformation-Based Decoys Database: An Unbiased Online Database for Training and Benchmarking Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.
Zhang X; Shen C; Wang T; Kang Y; Li D; Pan P; Wang J; Wang G; Deng Y; Xu L; Cao D; Hou T; Wang Z
J Med Chem; 2023 Jul; 66(13):9174-9183. PubMed ID: 37317043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving structure-based virtual screening performance via learning from scoring function components.
Xiong GL; Ye WL; Shen C; Lu AP; Hou TJ; Cao DS
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32496540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. TocoDecoy: A New Approach to Design Unbiased Datasets for Training and Benchmarking Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.
Zhang X; Shen C; Liao B; Jiang D; Wang J; Wu Z; Du H; Wang T; Huo W; Xu L; Cao D; Hsieh CY; Hou T
J Med Chem; 2022 Jun; 65(11):7918-7932. PubMed ID: 35642777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SCORCH: Improving structure-based virtual screening with machine learning classifiers, data augmentation, and uncertainty estimation.
McGibbon M; Money-Kyrle S; Blay V; Houston DR
J Adv Res; 2023 Apr; 46():135-147. PubMed ID: 35901959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the Generalization Abilities of Machine-Learning Scoring Functions for Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
Zhu H; Yang J; Huang N
J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5485-5502. PubMed ID: 36268980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ML-PLIC: a web platform for characterizing protein-ligand interactions and developing machine learning-based scoring functions.
Zhang X; Shen C; Wang T; Deng Y; Kang Y; Li D; Hou T; Pan P
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Sep; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 37738401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of compound library size on the performance of scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening.
Fresnais L; Ballester PJ
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32568385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Machine Learning Boosted Docking (HASTEN): An Open-source Tool To Accelerate Structure-based Virtual Screening Campaigns.
Kalliokoski T
Mol Inform; 2021 Sep; 40(9):e2100089. PubMed ID: 34060239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine learning on ligand-residue interaction profiles to significantly improve binding affinity prediction.
Ji B; He X; Zhai J; Zhang Y; Man VH; Wang J
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33758923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recent progress on the prospective application of machine learning to structure-based virtual screening.
Ghislat G; Rahman T; Ballester PJ
Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2021 Dec; 65():28-34. PubMed ID: 34052776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cheminformatics meets molecular mechanics: a combined application of knowledge-based pose scoring and physical force field-based hit scoring functions improves the accuracy of structure-based virtual screening.
Hsieh JH; Yin S; Wang XS; Liu S; Dokholyan NV; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jan; 52(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 22017385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. TB-IECS: an accurate machine learning-based scoring function for virtual screening.
Zhang X; Shen C; Jiang D; Zhang J; Ye Q; Xu L; Hou T; Pan P; Kang Y
J Cheminform; 2023 Jul; 15(1):63. PubMed ID: 37403155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MILCDock: Machine Learning Enhanced Consensus Docking for Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery.
Morris CJ; Stern JA; Stark B; Christopherson M; Della Corte D
J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5342-5350. PubMed ID: 36342217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A practical guide to machine-learning scoring for structure-based virtual screening.
Tran-Nguyen VK; Junaid M; Simeon S; Ballester PJ
Nat Protoc; 2023 Nov; 18(11):3460-3511. PubMed ID: 37845361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inactive-enriched machine-learning models exploiting patent data improve structure-based virtual screening for PDL1 dimerizers.
Gómez-Sacristán P; Simeon S; Tran-Nguyen VK; Patil S; Ballester PJ
J Adv Res; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38280715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
