These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32484749)

  • 1. Long-Term Evaluation of Drivers' Behavioral Adaptation to an Adaptive Collision Avoidance System.
    Muslim H; Itoh M
    Hum Factors; 2021 Nov; 63(7):1295-1315. PubMed ID: 32484749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Driver-initiated take-overs during critical braking maneuvers in automated driving - The role of time headway, traction usage, and trust in automation.
    Becker S; Brandenburg S; Thüring M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106725. PubMed ID: 35878555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
    Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and evaluation of cooperative human-machine interface for changing lanes in conditional driving automation.
    Muslim H; Kiu Leung C; Itoh M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106719. PubMed ID: 35660872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of unreliable automation, non-driving related task, and takeover time budget on drivers' takeover performance and workload.
    Shahini F; Park J; Welch K; Zahabi M
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):182-197. PubMed ID: 35451915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use patterns among early adopters of adaptive cruise control.
    Xiong H; Boyle LN; Moeckli J; Dow BR; Brown TL
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):722-33. PubMed ID: 23156618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How does intersection field of view influence driving safety in an emergent situation?
    Yan X; Zhang X; Xue Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():162-175. PubMed ID: 30036817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour.
    Madigan R; Louw T; Merat N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude.
    Lee JD; Liu SY; Domeyer J; DinparastDjadid A
    Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31596618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.
    Goncalves RC; Louw TL; Quaresma M; Madigan R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105788. PubMed ID: 33039820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Training for the safe activation of Automated Vehicles matters: Revealing the benefits of online training to creating glaringly better mental models and behaviour.
    Merriman SE; Revell KMA; Plant KL
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Oct; 112():104057. PubMed ID: 37285640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency and Quality of Exposure to Adaptive Cruise Control and Impact on Trust, Workload, and Mental Models.
    Pai G; Zhang F; Hungund AP; Pamarthi J; Roberts SC; Horrey WJ; Pradhan AK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107130. PubMed ID: 37336048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of automation trust in drivers' visual distraction during automation.
    Zhang Y; Ma J; Pan C; Chang R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257201. PubMed ID: 34520500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study.
    Li X; Rakotonirainy A; Yan X
    J Safety Res; 2019 Sep; 70():89-96. PubMed ID: 31848013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coming back into the loop: Drivers' perceptual-motor performance in critical events after automated driving.
    Louw T; Markkula G; Boer E; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():9-18. PubMed ID: 28837837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of non-driving related tasks while operating automated driving systems (ADS): A systematic review.
    Hungund AP; Kumar Pradhan A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107076. PubMed ID: 37150132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aging: Older Adults' Driving Behavior Using Longitudinal and Lateral Warning Systems.
    Souders DJ; Charness N; Roque NA; Pham H
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):229-248. PubMed ID: 31361158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.