229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32485521)
1. Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():105966. PubMed ID: 32485521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Anderson WN; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2012 Dec; 12(12):1122-8. PubMed ID: 23158968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiating minimum clinically important difference for primary and revision lumbar fusion surgeries.
Carreon LY; Bratcher KR; Canan CE; Burke LO; Djurasovic M; Glassman SD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jan; 18(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 23157276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative Zung depression scale predicts patient satisfaction independent of the extent of improvement after revision lumbar surgery.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Bydon A; Cheng JS; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 23422730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do patients with lumbar spinal stenosis benefit from decompression of levels with adjacent moderate stenosis? A prospective cohort study from the NORDSTEN study.
Tronstad S; Haug KJ; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Brisby H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Brox JI; Grundnes O; Franssen E; Indrekvam K; Solberg T; Hermansen E
Spine J; 2024 Jun; 24(6):1015-1021. PubMed ID: 38266826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.
Rampersaud YR; Ravi B; Lewis SJ; Stas V; Barron R; Davey R; Mahomed N
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 17669690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility after surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee--part 1: long-term change in health-related quality of life.
Rampersaud YR; Lewis SJ; Davey JR; Gandhi R; Mahomed NN
Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 24325880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcomes in older patients after posterolateral lumbar fusion.
Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Dimar JR; Campbell MJ; Puno RM; Johnson JR
Spine J; 2007; 7(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 17905316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Step activity monitoring in lumbar stenosis patients undergoing decompressive surgery.
Schulte TL; Schubert T; Winter C; Brandes M; Hackenberg L; Wassmann H; Liem D; Rosenbaum D; Bullmann V
Eur Spine J; 2010 Nov; 19(11):1855-64. PubMed ID: 20186442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discordance Abounds in Minimum Clinically Important Differences in THA: A Systematic Review.
Deckey DG; Verhey JT; Christopher ZK; Gerhart CRB; Clarke HD; Spangehl MJ; Bingham JS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Apr; 481(4):702-714. PubMed ID: 36398323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1203-9. PubMed ID: 24076442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Johnson JR; Puno RM; Campbell MJ
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18805059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life after decompression surgery without fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Ogura Y; Shinozaki Y; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Ogawa J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Jan; 30(4):470-475. PubMed ID: 30684939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
