These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3248617)

  • 1. A quantitative measurement of dentin adhesion defects for posterior composites in Class II restorations.
    Herrin HK; Tong T; Berg JH
    Fla Dent J; 1988; 59(3):22-4, 27. PubMed ID: 3248617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites.
    Neiva IF; de Andrada MA; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):282-9. PubMed ID: 9855849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of flowable composite resins when utilized as liners in Class II posterior composite resin restorations.
    Turner EW; Shook LW; Owens BM
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2002; 82(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 11979718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using posterior composites appropriately.
    Ferracane JL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1992 Jul; 123(7):53-8. PubMed ID: 1619167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Can current composites be used for Class I and II restorations in posterior teeth?].
    Baldensperger R
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1985; 14(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 3866285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro assessment of the effect of Scotchbond on the marginal leakage of class II composite restorations in primary molars.
    Holan G; Fuks AB; Grajower R; Chosack A
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1986; 53(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 3519710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posterior composite restorations: effect of margin design on microleakage.
    Crim GA
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1987; 66(4):27-9. PubMed ID: 3271833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations.
    Sarrett DC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 15680997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of Class II posterior composite restorations with gingival margins placed entirely within dentin.
    Stockton LW; Tsang ST
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2007 Apr; 73(3):255. PubMed ID: 17439712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Composite resin-amalgam compound restorations.
    Franchi M; Trisi P; Montanari G; Piattelli A
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):577-82. PubMed ID: 7568708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A protocol for successful posterior composite restorations.
    Coker HB
    J Ala Dent Assoc; 1992; 76(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 1527275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contemporary restoration of Class II caries. Direct posterior composites.
    Abel MG
    Dent Today; 2002 Nov; 21(11):94-7. PubMed ID: 12483933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Marginal leakage of Class II composite resin restorations: Part I].
    Nakano Y; Ohba H; Nitoh A; Hidaka T; Murasawa H; Takamizu M; Kohno A
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1987 Sep; 13(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 3506359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct posterior Class II composites.
    Maitland RI
    Curr Opin Cosmet Dent; 1994; ():40-6. PubMed ID: 8032439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [In vitro study of gingival microleakage in Class II composite restorations].
    Navajas Rodriguez de Mondelo JM; González Marquez I
    Av Odontoestomatol; 1988 Jun; 4(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 3252799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro study of microleakage of occlusal composite restorations polymerized by a conventional curing light and a PAC curing light.
    Stritikus J; Owens B
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 11314147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years.
    Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.