235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32486777)
21. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
Zekveld AA; Heslenfeld DJ; Johnsrude IS; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers.
Cooke M; Lu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2059-69. PubMed ID: 20968376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of acoustic and semantic cues on listening effort during native and non-native speech perception.
Borghini G; Hazan V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):3783. PubMed ID: 32611155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Listening Effort During Sentence Processing Is Increased for Non-native Listeners: A Pupillometry Study.
Borghini G; Hazan V
Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():152. PubMed ID: 29593489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Visual Speech Benefit in Clear and Degraded Speech Depends on the Auditory Intelligibility of the Talker and the Number of Background Talkers.
Blackburn CL; Kitterick PT; Jones G; Sumner CJ; Stacey PC
Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519837866. PubMed ID: 30909814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Energetic and Informational Maskers for Native and Nonnative Listeners.
Meemann K; Smiljanić R
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr; 65(4):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 35235410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Talker Versus Dialect Effects on Speech Intelligibility: A Symmetrical Study.
McCloy DR; Wright RA; Souza PE
Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):371-86. PubMed ID: 26529902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of Noise on Speech Intelligibility and Perceived Listening Effort in Head and Neck Cancer.
Eadie TL; Durr H; Sauder C; Nagle K; Kapsner-Smith M; Spencer KA
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Jun; 30(3S):1329-1342. PubMed ID: 33630664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. How do aging and age-related hearing loss affect the ability to communicate effectively in challenging communicative conditions?
Hazan V; Tuomainen O; Tu L; Kim J; Davis C; Brungart D; Sheffield B
Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():33-41. PubMed ID: 29941310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Acoustic richness modulates the neural networks supporting intelligible speech processing.
Lee YS; Min NE; Wingfield A; Grossman M; Peelle JE
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():108-117. PubMed ID: 26723103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels.
Ferguson SH; Kewley-Port D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1241-55. PubMed ID: 17905909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited.
Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
Pinet M; Iverson P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native talkers.
van Wijngaarden SJ; Steeneken HJ; Houtgast T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):3004-13. PubMed ID: 12509022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Lowers the Sustained Listening Effort During Continuous Speech in Noise-A Combined Pupillometry and EEG Study.
Fiedler L; Seifi Ala T; Graversen C; Alickovic E; Lunner T; Wendt D
Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1590-1601. PubMed ID: 33950865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Slower Speaking Rate Reduces Listening Effort Among Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
Winn MB; Teece KH
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):584-595. PubMed ID: 33002968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
