These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32486788)

  • 1. Auditory filter-bank compression improves estimation of signal-to-noise ratio for speech in noise.
    Liu F; Demosthenous A; Yasin I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3197. PubMed ID: 32486788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants.
    Kasturi K; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17485989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; Welhaven A; Oleson J
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 29466265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A beamformer post-filter for cochlear implant noise reduction.
    Hersbach AA; Grayden DB; Fallon JB; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2412-20. PubMed ID: 23556606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Busby PA; Arora K
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 26671316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic Accuracy of the AzBio Speech Recognition in Noise Test.
    Vermiglio AJ; Leclerc L; Thornton M; Osborne H; Bonilla E; Fang X
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug; 64(8):3303-3316. PubMed ID: 34236930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
    Meha-Bettison K; Sharma M; Ibrahim RK; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users - microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments.
    Büchner A; Schwebs M; Lenarz T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31590612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
    McShefferty D; Whitmer WM; Akeroyd MA
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Linguistic Processing in a Semantic Judgment Task: An Aging Study.
    Stanley N; Davis T; Estis J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):209-221. PubMed ID: 28277212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of a priori signal-to-noise ratio using neurograms for speech enhancement.
    Jassim WA; Harte N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):3830. PubMed ID: 32611151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Small SA; Sharma M; Bradford M; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.
    Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 17587137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ALTIS: A new algorithm for adaptive long-term SNR estimation in multi-talker babble.
    Soleymani R; Selesnick IW; Landsberger DM
    Comput Speech Lang; 2019 Nov; 58():231-246. PubMed ID: 32773961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of Tamil Mono-Syllabic and Bi-Syllabic Words in Multi-Talker Speech Babble by Young Adults with Normal Hearing.
    Gnanasekar S; Vaidyanath R
    J Audiol Otol; 2019 Oct; 23(4):181-186. PubMed ID: 31234249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Directionality, Compression, and Working Memory on Speech Recognition.
    Rallapalli V; Ellis G; Souza P
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):492-505. PubMed ID: 33136708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wearable Hearing Device Spectral Enhancement Driven by Non-Negative Sparse Coding-Based Residual Noise Reduction.
    Kim SM
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Oct; 20(20):. PubMed ID: 33050447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.