These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32488810)

  • 1. VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.
    Hamilton R; Bach M; Heinrich SP; Hoffmann MB; Odom JV; McCulloch DL; Thompson DA
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 142(1):25-74. PubMed ID: 32488810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ISCEV extended protocol for VEP methods of estimation of visual acuity.
    Hamilton R; Bach M; Heinrich SP; Hoffmann MB; Odom JV; McCulloch DL; Thompson DA
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 142(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 32676804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective assessment of visual acuity: a refined model for analyzing the sweep VEP.
    Strasser T; Nasser F; Langrová H; Zobor D; Lisowski Ł; Hillerkuss D; Sailer C; Kurtenbach A; Zrenner E
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 138(2):97-116. PubMed ID: 30694438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual acuity in unilateral cataract.
    Thompson DA; Møller H; Russell-Eggitt I; Kriss A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Sep; 80(9):794-8. PubMed ID: 8942375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conducting shorter VEP tests to estimate visual acuity via assessment of SNR.
    Iyer KK; Bradley AP; Wilson SJ
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 126(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23099657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of CRT and LCD monitors for objective estimation of visual acuity using the sweep VEP.
    Straßer T; Leinberger DT; Hillerkuss D; Zrenner E; Zobor D
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2022 Oct; 145(2):133-145. PubMed ID: 35788850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. VEP analysis methods in children with optic nerve hypoplasia: relationship to visual acuity and optic disc diameter.
    Kelly JP; Phillips JO; Weiss AH
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 133(3):159-169. PubMed ID: 27882486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a quantitative method to measure vision in children with chronic cortical visual impairment.
    Good WV
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2001; 99():253-69. PubMed ID: 11797314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting potential acuities in amblyopes: predicting post-therapy acuity in amblyopes.
    Ridder WH; Rouse MW
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 114(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 17310345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus duration, neural adaptation, and sweep visual evoked potential acuity estimates.
    Ridder WH; McCulloch D; Herbert AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Dec; 39(13):2759-68. PubMed ID: 9856787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of VEP Vernier acuity and grating acuity in human infants.
    Skoczenski AM; Norcia AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Sep; 40(10):2411-7. PubMed ID: 10476810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age norms for monocular grating acuity measured by sweep-VEP in the first three years of age.
    Salomão SR; Ejzenbaum F; Berezovsky A; Sacai PY; Pereira JM
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2008; 71(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 18797653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of Human Visual Acuity Using Visual Evoked Potential: A Review.
    Zheng X; Xu G; Zhang K; Liang R; Yan W; Tian P; Jia Y; Zhang S; Du C
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Sep; 20(19):. PubMed ID: 32998208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. P300-based acuity estimation in imitated amblyopia.
    Beusterien ML; Heinrich SP
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 136(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 29134296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. VEP-based acuity estimation: unaffected by translucency of contralateral occlusion.
    Heinrich SP; Strübin I; Bach M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; 143(3):249-257. PubMed ID: 33977361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imitating the effect of amblyopia on VEP-based acuity estimates.
    Heinrich SP; Bock CM; Bach M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 133(3):183-187. PubMed ID: 27864655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minor effect of inaccurate fixation on VEP-based acuity estimates.
    Elgohary AA; Heinrich SP
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 142(2):275-282. PubMed ID: 33037950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual-evoked response, pattern electroretinogram, and psychophysical magnocellular thresholds in glaucoma, optic atrophy, and dyslexia.
    Vaegan ; Hollows FC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 83(7):486-98. PubMed ID: 16840873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Normal and defective development of visual stimulus processing: psychophysical and electrophysiologic test results].
    Kau T; Boergen KP; Lorenz B
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 2086405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Measuring vernier acuity and motion perception with the parameter sweep VEP].
    Wesemann W; Norcia AM; Manny RE
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996 Jan; 208(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 8839339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.