These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32490069)

  • 21. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Rei M; Tavares S; Pinto P; Machado AP; Monteiro S; Costa A; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J; Ayres-De-Campos D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():27-31. PubMed ID: 27566218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Technical characteristics of current cardiotocographic monitors.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Nogueira-Reis Z
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():22-32. PubMed ID: 26206513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Developments in CTG analysis.
    Van Geijn HP
    Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Jun; 10(2):185-209. PubMed ID: 8836480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Fetal heart rate during labour: definitions and interpretation].
    Martin A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S34-45. PubMed ID: 18191915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparative study of a new cardiotocography analysis program.
    Chen CY; Chen JC; Yu C; Lin CW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():2567-70. PubMed ID: 19965213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prognostic model based on image-based time-frequency features and genetic algorithm for fetal hypoxia assessment.
    Cömert Z; Kocamaz AF; Subha V
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Aug; 99():85-97. PubMed ID: 29894897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cardiotocographic features in COVID-19 infected pregnant women.
    Sinaci S; Ocal DF; Ozden Tokalioglu E; Halici Ozturk F; Aydin Senel S; Keskin LH; Moraloglu Tekin O; Sahin D
    J Perinat Med; 2022 Jan; 50(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 34411469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A mathematical model for simulation of early decelerations in the cardiotocogram during labor.
    van der Hout-van der Jagt MB; Oei SG; Bovendeerd PH
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Jun; 34(5):579-89. PubMed ID: 22041128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Comparative Study on Fetal Heart Rates Estimated from Fetal Phonography and Cardiotocography.
    Ibrahim EA; Al Awar S; Balayah ZH; Hadjileontiadis LJ; Khandoker AH
    Front Physiol; 2017; 8():764. PubMed ID: 29089896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing.
    Devane D; Lalor JG; Daly S; McGuire W; Smith V
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; (2):CD005122. PubMed ID: 22336808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An effective digitization method for CTG paper report with binary background grids taken by smartphone.
    Zhao Z; Liu Z; Si Y; Zhang Y; Ye H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Mar; 200():105872. PubMed ID: 33288216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cardiotocography analysis by empirical dynamic modeling and Gaussian processes.
    Feng G; Heiselman C; Quirk JG; Djurić PM
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():1057807. PubMed ID: 36714626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Insight into variable fetal heart rate decelerations from a mathematical model.
    van der Hout-van der Jagt MB; Jongen GJ; Bovendeerd PH; Oei SG
    Early Hum Dev; 2013 Jun; 89(6):361-9. PubMed ID: 23273866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Relationship between computerized cardiotocography and perinatal outcomes].
    Liu W; Li X; Tang D
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(10):581-4. PubMed ID: 16134517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of features for automatic CTG analysis based on expert annotation.
    Chudácek V; Spilka J; Lhotská L; Janku P; Koucký M; Huptych M; Bursa M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():6051-4. PubMed ID: 22255719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography.
    Galazios G; Tripsianis G; Tsikouras P; Koutlaki N; Liberis V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Feb; 281(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 19455348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A systematic review of automated pre-processing, feature extraction and classification of cardiotocography.
    Al-Yousif S; Jaenul A; Al-Dayyeni W; Alamoodi A; Jabori I; Md Tahir N; Alrawi AAA; Cömert Z; Al-Shareefi NA; Saleh AH
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e452. PubMed ID: 33987454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intrapartum heart rate ambiguity: a comparison of cardiotocogram and abdominal fetal electrocardiogram with maternal electrocardiogram.
    Reinhard J; Hayes-Gill BR; Schiermeier S; Hatzmann H; Heinrich TM; Louwen F
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 23328351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Antepartum cardiotocography: a study of fetal reactivity in frequency domain.
    Romano M; Bracale M; Cesarelli M; Campanile M; Bifulco P; De Falco M; Sansone M; Di Lieto A
    Comput Biol Med; 2006 Jun; 36(6):619-33. PubMed ID: 16005863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. UNSUPERVISED CLUSTERING AND ANALYSIS OF CONTRACTION-DEPENDENT FETAL HEART RATE SEGMENTS.
    Yang L; Heiselman C; Quirk JG; Djurić PM
    Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process; 2022 May; 2022():. PubMed ID: 36035504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.