These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32490084)

  • 21. Political and affective polarisation in a democracy in crisis: The E-Dem panel survey dataset (Spain, 2018-2019).
    Torcal M; Santana A; Carty E; Comellas JM
    Data Brief; 2020 Oct; 32():106059. PubMed ID: 32885001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dataset of Historical Elections in Catalonia (DHEC): Micro-level Historical Results (1890-1923).
    Vall-Prat P
    Data Brief; 2021 Jun; 36():107017. PubMed ID: 33937453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. First public dataset to study 2023 Turkish general election.
    Najafi A; Mugurtay N; Zouzou Y; Demirci E; Demirkiran S; Karadeniz HA; Varol O
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8794. PubMed ID: 38627434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. COVID-19 Public Health Measures During National Assembly Elections of the Republic of Korea.
    Kim EY; Kim EK; Lee M; Park HK
    Osong Public Health Res Perspect; 2020 Aug; 11(4):158-163. PubMed ID: 32864305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Abortion and the presidential election of 1976: a multivariate analysis of voting behavior.
    Vinovskis MA
    Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1750-71. PubMed ID: 10245970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Forecasting elections with agent-based modeling: Two live experiments.
    Gao M; Wang Z; Wang K; Liu C; Tang S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0270194. PubMed ID: 35771877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Age, education, and political involvement differences in daily election-related stress.
    Early AS; Smith EL; Neupert SD
    Curr Psychol; 2022 May; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 35669213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election.
    Chen E; Deb A; Ferrara E
    J Comput Soc Sci; 2022; 5(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33824934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using Elicited Choice Probabilities in Hypothetical Elections to Study Decisions to Vote.
    Delavande A; Manski CF
    Elect Stud; 2015 Jun; 38():28-37. PubMed ID: 25705068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving election prediction internationally.
    Kennedy R; Wojcik S; Lazer D
    Science; 2017 Feb; 355(6324):515-520. PubMed ID: 28154078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using public opinion to serve journalistic narratives: Rethinking vox pops and live two-way reporting in five UK election campaigns (2009-2017).
    Cushion S
    Eur J Commun; 2018 Dec; 33(6):639-656. PubMed ID: 30587881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Persuadable voters decided the 2022 midterm: Abortion rights and issues-based frameworks for studying election outcomes.
    Kann C; Ebanks D; Morrier J; Alvarez RM
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0294047. PubMed ID: 38241402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. From Twitter to Aso-Rock: A sentiment analysis framework for understanding Nigeria 2023 presidential election.
    Olabanjo O; Wusu A; Afisi O; Asokere M; Padonu R; Olabanjo O; Ojo O; Folorunso O; Aribisala B; Mazzara M
    Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e16085. PubMed ID: 37215756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Online engagement with 2020 election misinformation and turnout in the 2021 Georgia runoff election.
    Green J; Hobbs W; McCabe S; Lazer D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(34):e2115900119. PubMed ID: 35972960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Getting food policy on the Mayoral table: a comparison of two election cycles in New York and London.
    Freudenberg N; Atkinson S
    Public Health; 2015 Apr; 129(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 25834929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Factors associated with post-election psychological distress: The case of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Pitcho-Prelorentzos S; Kaniasty K; Hamama-Raz Y; Goodwin R; Ring L; Ben-Ezra M; Mahat-Shamir M
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Aug; 266():1-4. PubMed ID: 29787806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dislike of general opinion makes for tight elections.
    Devauchelle O; Szymczak P; Nowakowski P
    Phys Rev E; 2024 Apr; 109(4-1):044106. PubMed ID: 38755890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spanish electoral archive. SEA database.
    Pérez V; Aybar C; Pavía JM
    Sci Data; 2021 Jul; 8(1):193. PubMed ID: 34321488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How the polls can be both spot on and dead wrong: using choice blindness to shift political attitudes and voter intentions.
    Hall L; Strandberg T; Pärnamets P; Lind A; Tärning B; Johansson P
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60554. PubMed ID: 23593244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Candidate preferences and expectations of election outcomes.
    Delavande A; Manski CF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Mar; 109(10):3711-5. PubMed ID: 22355121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.