683 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32490158)
1. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration
Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Farias GFA; Madruga-Neto AC; Ryou M; Thompson CC
World J Clin Cases; 2021 Dec; 9(34):10507-10517. PubMed ID: 35004982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Fine-Needle Biopsy for Lymph Node Diagnosis: A Large Multicenter Comparative Analysis.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Farias GFA; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Clin Endosc; 2020 Sep; 53(5):600-610. PubMed ID: 31794654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C
Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration compared to endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle biopsy: diagnostic yield and the value of onsite cytopathological assessment.
Khan MA; Grimm IS; Ali B; Nollan R; Tombazzi C; Ismail MK; Baron TH
Endosc Int Open; 2017 May; 5(5):E363-E375. PubMed ID: 28497108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T
World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Addition of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and On-Site Cytology to EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Increases Procedure Time but Not Diagnostic Accuracy.
Keswani RN; Krishnan K; Wani S; Keefer L; Komanduri S
Clin Endosc; 2014 May; 47(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 24944988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cheng B; Zhang Y; Chen Q; Sun B; Deng Z; Shan H; Dou L; Wang J; Li Y; Yang X; Jiang T; Xu G; Wang G
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does ProCore Fine-Needle Biopsy Really Improve the Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling of Pancreatic Masses?
Delconte G; Cavalcoli F; Magarotto A; Centonze G; Bezzio C; Cattaneo L; Rausa E; Kelly ME; Bonitta G; Milione M; Enzo M
Dig Dis; 2022; 40(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 33780932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of the lung masses: a multicenter experience with fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy needles.
Mangiavillano B; Spatola F; Facciorusso A; De Nucci G; Ligresti D; Henry Eusebi L; Lisotti A; Auriemma F; Lamonaca L; Paduano D; Crinò S; Scarlata S; Troncone E; Del Vecchio Blanco G; Manes G; Traina M; Bertani A; Ofosu A; Binda C; Fabbri C; Muscatiello N; Fusaroli P; Repici A; Carrara S
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Jul; 34(7):757-762. PubMed ID: 35482928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
Gonzalez A; Wadhwa V; Singh H; Khan S; Gupta K; Liang H; Hussain I; Vargo J; Jang S; Chahal P; Bhatt A; Siddiki H; Erim T; Sanaka MR
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study.
Asokkumar R; Yung Ka C; Loh T; Kah Ling L; Gek San T; Ying H; Tan D; Khor C; Lim T; Soetikno R
Endosc Int Open; 2019 Aug; 7(8):E955-E963. PubMed ID: 31367675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid mass lesions of the pancreas: A retrospective comparison study of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy.
Sweeney J; Soong L; Goyal A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Apr; 48(4):322-329. PubMed ID: 31903736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy was not more cost-effective than fine-needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation in gastrointestinal lesions diagnosis.
Sbeit W; Khoury T
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Aug; 49(8):944-947. PubMed ID: 33973746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
