238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32490778)
1. Radiolucent lines around knee arthroplasty components : a narrative review.
Wautier D; Ftaïta S; Thienpont E
Acta Orthop Belg; 2020 Mar; 86(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 32490778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The natural history of tibial radiolucent lines in a proximally cemented stemmed total knee arthroplasty.
Smith S; Naima VS; Freeman MA
J Arthroplasty; 1999 Jan; 14(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 9926946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Appearance and evolution of radiolucent lines below the tibial implant in primary total knee arthroplasty.
Wautier D; Thienpont E
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Mar; 144(3):1333-1344. PubMed ID: 37878076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The rates of osteolysis and loosening associated with a modular posterior stabilized knee replacement. Results at five to fourteen years.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Mar; 86(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 14996878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histology of the bone-cement interface in retrieved Oxford unicompartmental knee replacements.
Kendrick BJ; James AR; Pandit H; Gill HS; Price AJ; Blunn GW; Murray DW
Knee; 2012 Dec; 19(6):918-22. PubMed ID: 22542361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of bone cement directly to the implant in primary total knee arthroplasty. Short-term radiological and clinical follow-up of two different cementing techniques.
Holzer LA; Finsterwald MA; Sobhi S; Jones CW; Yates PJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Jan; 144(1):333-340. PubMed ID: 37736767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pressurized carbon dioxide lavage reduces the incidence of a radiolucent line around the tibial component two years after total knee arthroplasty.
Sasaki R; Nagashima M; Otani T; Okada Y; Aibara N; Takeshima K; Ishii K
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Jul; 17(1):349. PubMed ID: 35841041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tourniquet Use Improves Cement Penetration and Reduces Radiolucent Line Progression at 5 Years After Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Hegde V; Bracey DN; Johnson RM; Dennis DA; Jennings JM
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jul; 36(7S):S209-S214. PubMed ID: 33500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Femoral Component Varus Malposition is Associated with Tibial Aseptic Loosening After TKA.
Lee BS; Cho HI; Bin SI; Kim JM; Jo BK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):400-407. PubMed ID: 29389790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aseptic Loosening at the Tibia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Function of Cement Mantle Quality?
Hampton CB; Berliner ZP; Nguyen JT; Mendez L; Smith SS; Joseph AD; Padgett DE; Rodriguez JA
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S190-S196. PubMed ID: 32171492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Occurrence and Progression of Early Radiolucent Lines around Total Knee Arthroplasty].
Holinka M; Gallo J; Pavličný R
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2017; 84(5):347-354. PubMed ID: 29351535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early aseptic loosening of the tibial component at the cement-implant interface in total knee arthroplasty: a narrative overview of potentially associated factors.
van Otten TJM; van Loon CJM
Acta Orthop Belg; 2022 Mar; 88(1):103-111. PubMed ID: 35512160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Failure at the Tibial Cement-Implant Interface With the Use of High-Viscosity Cement in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Kopinski JE; Aggarwal A; Nunley RM; Barrack RL; Nam D
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2579-2582. PubMed ID: 27155996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Diagnosis of loosening after knee arthroplasty].
Stotter C; von Roth P
Orthopade; 2021 Dec; 50(12):972-978. PubMed ID: 34694449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Novel Percentage-Based System for Determining Aseptic Loosening of Total Knee Arthroplasty Tibial Components.
Chalmers BP; Sculco PK; Fehring KA; Trousdale RT; Taunton MJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jul; 32(7):2274-2278. PubMed ID: 28285901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiolucent lines in low-contact-stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a blinded and matched case control study.
Sadoghi P; Leithner A; Weber P; Friesenbichler J; Gruber G; Kastner N; Pohlmann K; Jansson V; Wegener B
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 Jun; 12():142. PubMed ID: 21714916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study.
Peters CL; Hennessey R; Barden RM; Galante JO; Rosenberg AG
J Arthroplasty; 1997 Dec; 12(8):896-903. PubMed ID: 9458255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No difference in radiolucent lines after TKA: a matched-pair analysis of the classic implant and its evolutional design.
Behrend H; Hochreiter B; Potocnik P; El Baz Y; Zdravkovic V; Tomazi T
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Dec; 28(12):3962-3968. PubMed ID: 32062683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Revision knee arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening].
Rozkydal Z; Janík P; Janícek P; Kunovský R
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17331449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do bone loss and reconstruction procedures differ at revision of cemented unicompartmental knee prostheses according to the use of metal-back or all-polyethylene tibial component?
Rouanet T; Combes A; Migaud H; Pasquier G
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Oct; 99(6):687-92. PubMed ID: 23810395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
