These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32491877)

  • 1. Combining machine learning with knowledge-based modeling for scalable forecasting and subgrid-scale closure of large, complex, spatiotemporal systems.
    Wikner A; Pathak J; Hunt B; Girvan M; Arcomano T; Szunyogh I; Pomerance A; Ott E
    Chaos; 2020 May; 30(5):053111. PubMed ID: 32491877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hybrid forecasting of chaotic processes: Using machine learning in conjunction with a knowledge-based model.
    Pathak J; Wikner A; Fussell R; Chandra S; Hunt BR; Girvan M; Ott E
    Chaos; 2018 Apr; 28(4):041101. PubMed ID: 31906641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using data assimilation to train a hybrid forecast system that combines machine-learning and knowledge-based components.
    Wikner A; Pathak J; Hunt BR; Szunyogh I; Girvan M; Ott E
    Chaos; 2021 May; 31(5):053114. PubMed ID: 34240950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A systematic exploration of reservoir computing for forecasting complex spatiotemporal dynamics.
    Platt JA; Penny SG; Smith TA; Chen TC; Abarbanel HDI
    Neural Netw; 2022 Sep; 153():530-552. PubMed ID: 35839598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Model-Free Prediction of Large Spatiotemporally Chaotic Systems from Data: A Reservoir Computing Approach.
    Pathak J; Hunt B; Girvan M; Lu Z; Ott E
    Phys Rev Lett; 2018 Jan; 120(2):024102. PubMed ID: 29376715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parallel Machine Learning for Forecasting the Dynamics of Complex Networks.
    Srinivasan K; Coble N; Hamlin J; Antonsen T; Ott E; Girvan M
    Phys Rev Lett; 2022 Apr; 128(16):164101. PubMed ID: 35522516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models.
    Rasp S; Pritchard MS; Gentine P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Sep; 115(39):9684-9689. PubMed ID: 30190437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robust manifold broad learning system for large-scale noisy chaotic time series prediction: A perturbation perspective.
    Feng S; Ren W; Han M; Chen YW
    Neural Netw; 2019 Sep; 117():179-190. PubMed ID: 31170577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine learning dynamical phase transitions in complex networks.
    Ni Q; Tang M; Liu Y; Lai YC
    Phys Rev E; 2019 Nov; 100(5-1):052312. PubMed ID: 31870001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting phase and sensing phase coherence in chaotic systems with machine learning.
    Zhang C; Jiang J; Qu SX; Lai YC
    Chaos; 2020 Aug; 30(8):083114. PubMed ID: 32872815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining data assimilation and machine learning to infer unresolved scale parametrization.
    Brajard J; Carrassi A; Bocquet M; Bertino L
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 Apr; 379(2194):20200086. PubMed ID: 33583267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Memory-based parameterization with differentiable solver: Application to Lorenz '96.
    Bhouri MA; Gentine P
    Chaos; 2023 Jul; 33(7):. PubMed ID: 37408156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Explaining the physics of transfer learning in data-driven turbulence modeling.
    Subel A; Guan Y; Chattopadhyay A; Hassanzadeh P
    PNAS Nexus; 2023 Mar; 2(3):pgad015. PubMed ID: 36896127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Machine learning algorithms for predicting the amplitude of chaotic laser pulses.
    Amil P; Soriano MC; Masoller C
    Chaos; 2019 Nov; 29(11):113111. PubMed ID: 31779344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximum Information Exploitation Using Broad Learning System for Large-Scale Chaotic Time-Series Prediction.
    Han M; Li W; Feng S; Qiu T; Chen CLP
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2021 Jun; 32(6):2320-2329. PubMed ID: 32697722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complex hybrid models combining deterministic and machine learning components for numerical climate modeling and weather prediction.
    Krasnopolsky VM; Fox-Rabinovitz MS
    Neural Netw; 2006 Mar; 19(2):122-34. PubMed ID: 16527454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting chaotic dynamics from incomplete input via reservoir computing with (D+1)-dimension input and output.
    Shi L; Yan Y; Wang H; Wang S; Qu SX
    Phys Rev E; 2023 May; 107(5-1):054209. PubMed ID: 37329034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DEFM: Delay-embedding-based forecast machine for time series forecasting by spatiotemporal information transformation.
    Peng H; Wang W; Chen P; Liu R
    Chaos; 2024 Apr; 34(4):. PubMed ID: 38572943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hybridizing traditional and next-generation reservoir computing to accurately and efficiently forecast dynamical systems.
    Chepuri R; Amzalag D; Antonsen TM; Girvan M
    Chaos; 2024 Jun; 34(6):. PubMed ID: 38838103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.