These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32493568)

  • 1. Influence of scan body design on accuracy of the implant position as transferred to a virtual definitive implant cast.
    Revilla-León M; Smith Z; Methani MM; Zandinejad A; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):918-923. PubMed ID: 32493568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of scan body design and digital implant analogs on implant replica position in additively manufactured casts.
    Revilla-León M; Fogarty R; Barrington JJ; Zandinejad A; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):202-210. PubMed ID: 31787272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of the Implant Replica Positions on the Complete Edentulous Additive Manufactured Cast.
    Olea-Vielba M; Jareño-García D; Methani MM; Martinez-Klemm I; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):780-786. PubMed ID: 32337776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of digital implant analog design on the positional trueness of an analog in additively manufactured models: An in-vitro study.
    Mata-Mata SJ; Donmez MB; Meirelles L; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Dec; 24(6):821-830. PubMed ID: 36196856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trueness and precision of complete-arch photogrammetry implant scanning assessed with a coordinate-measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Rubenstein J; Methani MM; Piedra-Cascón W; Özcan M; Att W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):160-165. PubMed ID: 34154820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of implant angulation and clinical implant scan body height on the accuracy of complete arch intraoral digital scans.
    Gómez-Polo M; Sallorenzo A; Ortega R; Gómez-Polo C; Barmak AB; Att W; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):119-127. PubMed ID: 35337658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrepancy of complete-arch titanium frameworks manufactured using selective laser melting and electron beam melting additive manufacturing technologies.
    Revilla-León M; Ceballos L; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):942-947. PubMed ID: 30006219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
    Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrepancy at the implant abutment-prosthesis interface of complete-arch cobalt-chromium implant frameworks fabricated by additive and subtractive technologies before and after ceramic veneering.
    Revilla-León M; Sánchez-Rubio JL; Pérez-López J; Rubenstein J; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):795-803. PubMed ID: 32461043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression.
    Kim KR; Seo KY; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):543-549. PubMed ID: 30955939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of supramucosal height of a scan body and implant angulation on the accuracy of intraoral scanning: An in vitro study.
    Sicilia E; Lagreca G; Papaspyridakos P; Finkelman M; Cobo J; Att W; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1126-1134. PubMed ID: 36828728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of simulated intraoral variables on the accuracy of a photogrammetric imaging technique for complete-arch implant prostheses.
    Bratos M; Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):232-241. PubMed ID: 29559220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of different digital acquisition methods in complete arch implant-supported prostheses: An in vitro study.
    Pinto RJ; Casado SA; Chmielewski K; Caramês JM; Marques DS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):172-177. PubMed ID: 37620183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes.
    Papaspyridakos P; Gallucci GO; Chen CJ; Hanssen S; Naert I; Vandenberghe B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 25682892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positional transfer accuracy of titanium base implant abutment provided by two different scan body designs: an invitro study.
    Ramadan RE; Razek MKA; Mohamed FS; Fahmy RA; Abd-Ellah ME
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):746. PubMed ID: 37821890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of Different Scan Bodies and Scan Strategies on the Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Assessed with an Intraoral Scanner: An In Vitro Study.
    Motel C; Kirchner E; Adler W; Wichmann M; Matta RE
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):309-314. PubMed ID: 31802574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Congruence between the meshes of a combined healing abutment-scan body system acquired with four different intraoral scanners and the corresponding library file: An in vitro analysis.
    Donmez MB; Marques VR; Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Schimmel M; Yilmaz B
    J Dent; 2022 Mar; 118():103938. PubMed ID: 34942277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between stereophotogrammetric, digital, and conventional impression techniques in implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: An in vitro study.
    Tohme H; Lawand G; Chmielewska M; Makhzoume J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 129(2):354-362. PubMed ID: 34112521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Position Accuracy of Implant Analogs on 3D Printed Polymer versus Conventional Dental Stone Casts Measured Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine.
    Revilla-León M; Gonzalez-Martín Ó; Pérez López J; Sánchez-Rubio JL; Özcan M
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):560-567. PubMed ID: 29148121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.