153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32494452)
21. Efficacy and safety comparison between different types of novel design enhanced open-irrigated ablation catheters in creating cavo-tricuspid isthmus block.
Hamaya R; Miyazaki S; Kajiyama T; Watanabe T; Kusa S; Nakamura H; Hachiya H; Iesaka Y
J Cardiol; 2018 May; 71(5):513-516. PubMed ID: 29239758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Initial impedance decrease as an indicator of good catheter contact: insights from radiofrequency ablation with force sensing catheters.
Reichlin T; Knecht S; Lane C; Kühne M; Nof E; Chopra N; Tadros TM; Reddy VY; Schaer B; John RM; Osswald S; Stevenson WG; Sticherling C; Michaud GF
Heart Rhythm; 2014 Feb; 11(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 24177370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Randomized controlled trial of Amigo® robotically controlled versus manually controlled ablation of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus using a contact force ablation catheter.
Hoffmayer KS; Krainski F; Shah S; Hunter J; Alegre M; Hsu JC; Feld GK
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Mar; 51(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29435790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Multicentre randomised trial comparing contact force with electrical coupling index in atrial flutter ablation (VERISMART trial).
Begg GA; O'Neill J; Sohaib A; McLean A; Pepper CB; Graham LN; Hogarth AJ; Page SP; Gillott RG; Hill N; Walshaw J; Schilling RJ; Kanagaratnam P; Tayebjee MH
PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0212903. PubMed ID: 30943196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. "Largest amplitude ablation" is the optimal approach for typical atrial flutter ablation: a subanalysis from the AURUM 8 study.
Lewalter T; Lickfett L; Weiss C; Mewis C; Spencker S; Jung W; Haverkamp W; Schwacke H; Deneke T; Proff J; Dorwarth U; Bauer W
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 May; 23(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 22458432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Two Year, Single Center Clinical Outcome After Catheter Ablation For Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Guided by Lesion Index.
Sundaram S; Choe W; Jordan JR; Boorman C; Mullins N; Davies A; Stucky A; Nath S
J Atr Fibrillation; 2018; 11(1):1760. PubMed ID: 30455828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Comparison of the Efficacy of Voltage-directed Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation Using Mini Versus Conventional Electrodes.
Somani R; Andre Ng G; Hobson NA; Redfearn DP; Caldwell JC
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag; 2018 Jun; 9(6):3198-3203. PubMed ID: 32477813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Randomized comparison of anatomical versus voltage guided ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus for atrial flutter.
Hall B; Veerareddy S; Cheung P; Good E; Lemola K; Han J; Kamala T; Chugh A; Pelosi F; Morady F; Oral H
Heart Rhythm; 2004 May; 1(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15851115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Impact of cavotricuspid isthmus morphology in CRYO versus radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter.
Saygi S; Bastani H; Drca N; Insulander P; Wredlert C; Schwieler J; Jensen-Urstad M
Scand Cardiovasc J; 2017 Apr; 51(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 27826985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of power and contact force on index-guided radiofrequency lesions in an ex vivo porcine heart model.
Lozano Granero C; Franco E; Matía Francés R; Hernández-Madrid A; Sánchez-Pérez I; Zamorano Gómez JL; Moreno J
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2022 Apr; 63(3):687-697. PubMed ID: 34997886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation with large-tip gold alloy versus platinum-iridium-tip electrode catheters.
Kardos A; Foldesi C; Mihalcz A; Szili-Torok T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Mar; 32 Suppl 1():S138-40. PubMed ID: 19250078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Characterization of a stepwise approach in cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter: A randomized study comparing three catheters.
Rubín JM; Calvo D; Pérez D; Fidalgo A; de la Hera JM; Martínez L; Capín E; Arrizabalaga H; Carballeira L; García D; Morís C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Oct; 40(10):1052-1058. PubMed ID: 28846143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cavotricuspid Isthmus Anatomy Determines The Success Of Remote Controlled Magnetic Bidirectional Block: A Comparsion Between Magnetic 8-mm Solid Tip And 3.5-mm Magnetic Irrigated Tip Catheter.
Koektuerk B; Chun JK; Wissner E; Schmidt B; Ernst S; Ouyang F; Kuck KH
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J; 2011 Jul; 11(4):103-14. PubMed ID: 21760681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Atrial fibrillation ablation using very short duration 50 W ablations and contact force sensing catheters.
Winkle RA; Moskovitz R; Hardwin Mead R; Engel G; Kong MH; Fleming W; Salcedo J; Patrawala RA; Tranter JH; Shai I
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Jun; 52(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29460232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The force stability of tissue contact and lesion size index during radiofrequency ablation: An ex-vivo study.
Parwani AS; Hohendanner F; Bode D; Kuhlmann S; Blaschke F; Lacour P; Heinzel FR; Pieske B; Boldt LH
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2020 Mar; 43(3):327-331. PubMed ID: 32091133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contact Force-Guided versus Contact Force-Blinded Cavo-Tricuspid Isthmus Ablation for Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Abuelazm M; Mohamed I; Seri AR; Almaadawy O; Abdelazeem B; Brašić JR
Diseases; 2023 Jul; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 37489450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Local impedance measurements during contact force-guided cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for predicting an effective radiofrequency ablation.
Sasaki T; Nakamura K; Minami K; Take Y; Nakatani Y; Miki Y; Goto K; Kaseno K; Yamashita E; Koyama K; Naito S
J Arrhythm; 2022 Apr; 38(2):245-252. PubMed ID: 35387143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative Effectiveness of Various Radiofrequency Ablation Catheters in the Ablation of Typical Atrial Flutter.
Gorantla A; Alsaiqali M; Francois J; Sivakumar S; Freytes-Santiago L; Jallad A; Budzikowski AS
Cardiol Ther; 2023 Dec; 12(4):741-747. PubMed ID: 37864121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Local impedance-guided ablation and ultra-high density mapping versus conventional or contact force-guided ablation with mapping for treatment of cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter.
Saraf K; Black N; Garratt CJ; Muhyaldeen SA; Morris GM
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J; 2022; 22(4):188-194. PubMed ID: 35427782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Kumar N; Pison L; Lozekoot P; Choudhury R; La Meir M; Gelsomino S; Crijns H; Maessen J
Neth Heart J; 2015 Aug; 23(9):438-46. PubMed ID: 26153267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
