131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32495139)
1. Evaluation of the Iwate Model for Predicting the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Does Tumor Size Matter?
Ivanecz A; Plahuta I; Magdalenić T; Ilijevec B; Mencinger M; Peruš I; Potrč S
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Jun; 25(6):1451-1460. PubMed ID: 32495139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The external validation of a difficulty scoring system for predicting the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.
Ivanecz A; Plahuta I; Magdalenić T; Mencinger M; Peruš I; Potrč S; Krebs B
BMC Surg; 2019 Nov; 19(1):179. PubMed ID: 31775813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Resection type is a predictor of postoperative complications in laparoscopic partial liver resection.
Tanemura A; Mizuno S; Maeda K; Shinkai T; Ito T; Hayasaki A; Gyoten K; Fujii T; Iizawa Y; Murata Y; Kuriyama N; Kishiwada M; Sakurai H
Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):9054-9063. PubMed ID: 35831677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. External validation of different difficulty scoring systems of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Lin H; Bai Y; Yin M; Chen Z; Yu S
Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):3732-3749. PubMed ID: 34406470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of complexity and complications of laparoscopic liver surgery: The comparison of the Halls-score to the IWATE-score in 100 consecutive laparoscopic liver resections.
Tripke V; Huber T; Mittler J; Lang H; Heinrich S
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2020 Jul; 27(7):380-387. PubMed ID: 32162482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the IWATE criteria as a laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score in a single North American cohort.
Barron JO; Orabi D; Moro A; Quintini C; Berber E; Aucejo FN; Sasaki K; Kwon CD
Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3601-3609. PubMed ID: 34031739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.
Tanaka S; Kawaguchi Y; Kubo S; Kanazawa A; Takeda Y; Hirokawa F; Nitta H; Nakajima T; Kaizu T; Kaibori M; Kojima T; Otsuka Y; Fuks D; Hasegawa K; Kokudo N; Kaneko H; Gayet B; Wakabayashi G
Surgery; 2019 Apr; 165(4):731-740. PubMed ID: 30446171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A machine learning analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic liver surgery.
Ruzzenente A; Bagante F; Poletto E; Campagnaro T; Conci S; De Bellis M; Pedrazzani C; Guglielmi A
Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):8869-8880. PubMed ID: 35604481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The difficulty grade of laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma correlates with long-term outcomes.
Lv X; Zhang L; Yu X; Yu H
Updates Surg; 2023 Jun; 75(4):881-888. PubMed ID: 36773170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Based on the IWATE criteria: to investigate the influence of different surgical approaches on the perioperative outcomes of hepatectomy.
Xie F; Ge J; Sheng W; Wang D; Liao W; Li E; Wu L; Lei J
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1044-1052. PubMed ID: 36109356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility of the Iwate difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy: do surgical outcomes differ for tumors in segments VI and VII?
Choi SH; Chen KH; Syn NL; Cipriani F; Cheung TT; Chiow AKH; Choi GH; Siow TF; Sucandy I; Marino MV; Gastaca M; Chong CC; Lee JH; Ivanecz A; Mazzaferro V; Lopez-Ben S; Fondevila C; Rotellar F; Campos RR; Efanov M; Kingham TP; Sutcliffe RP; Troisi RI; Pratschke J; Wang X; D'Hondt M; Yong CC; Levi Sandri GB; Tang CN; Ruzzenente A; Cherqui D; Ferrero A; Wakabayashi G; Scatton O; Aghayan D; Edwin B; Coelho FF; Giuliante F; Liu R; Sijberden J; Abu Hilal M; Sugioka A; Long TCD; Fuks D; Aldrighetti L; Han HS; Goh BKP;
Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):9204-9214. PubMed ID: 35851819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of Clinical Outcomes After Robotic Hepatectomy Applying the Western-Model Southampton Laparoscopic Difficulty Scoring System. An Experience From a Tertiary US Hepatobiliary Center.
Sucandy I; Kang RD; Adorno J; Goodwin S; Crespo K; Syblis C; Ross S; Rosemurgy A
Am Surg; 2023 Sep; 89(9):3788-3793. PubMed ID: 37265440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. IWATE criteria are associated with perioperative outcomes in robotic hepatectomy: a retrospective review of 225 resections.
Labadie KP; Droullard DJ; Lois AW; Daniel SK; McNevin KE; Gonzalez JV; Seo YD; Sullivan KM; Bilodeau KS; Dickerson LK; Utria AF; Calhoun J; Pillarisetty VG; Sham JG; Yeung RS; Park JO
Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):889-895. PubMed ID: 33608766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The preoperative M2BPGi score predicts operative difficulty and the incidence of postoperative complications in laparoscopic liver resection.
Fuji T; Kojima T; Kajioka H; Sakamoto M; Oka R; Katayama T; Narahara Y; Niguma T
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1262-1273. PubMed ID: 36175698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation and comparison of the Iwate, IMM, Southampton and Hasegawa difficulty scoring systems for primary laparoscopic hepatectomies.
Goh BKP; Prieto M; Syn N; Koh YX; Teo JY; Lee SY; Chung AY; Chan CY
HPB (Oxford); 2021 May; 23(5):770-776. PubMed ID: 33023824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of liver cirrhosis on the difficulty of minimally-invasive liver resections: a 1:1 coarsened exact-matched controlled study.
Goh BKP; Syn N; Lee SY; Koh YX; Teo JY; Kam JH; Cheow PC; Jeyaraj PR; Chow PK; Ooi LL; Chung AY; Chan CY
Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5231-5238. PubMed ID: 32974782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation and performance of three-level procedure-based classification for laparoscopic liver resection.
Kawaguchi Y; Tanaka S; Fuks D; Kanazawa A; Takeda Y; Hirokawa F; Nitta H; Nakajima T; Kaizu T; Kaibori M; Kojima T; Otsuka Y; Kubo S; Hasegawa K; Kokudo N; Kaneko H; Wakabayashi G; Gayet B
Surg Endosc; 2020 May; 34(5):2056-2066. PubMed ID: 31338665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma by defining surgical difficulty.
Periyasamy M; Cho JY; Ahn S; Han HS; Yoon YS; Choi Y; Jang JS; Kwon SU; Kim S; Choi JK; Guro H
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5209-5218. PubMed ID: 28526962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Results of robotic liver surgery in association with IWATE criteria - the first 100 cases.
Steinkraus KC; Traub B; Heger P; Zaimi M; Mihaljevic AL; Michalski CW; Kornmann M; Hüttner FJ
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2024 Feb; 409(1):50. PubMed ID: 38305912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification system for robotic liver resection.
Sucandy I; Kang RD; Adorno J; Crespo K; Syblis C; Ross S; Rosemurgy A
HPB (Oxford); 2023 Sep; 25(9):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 37217370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
