These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Attention scales according to inferred real-world object size. Collegio AJ; Nah JC; Scotti PS; Shomstein S Nat Hum Behav; 2019 Jan; 3(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 30932061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Object-based visual attention in 8-month-old infants: evidence from an eye-tracking study. Bulf H; Valenza E Dev Psychol; 2013 Oct; 49(10):1909-18. PubMed ID: 23276133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effects of visual search efficiency on object-based attention. Greenberg AS; Rosen M; Cutrone E; Behrmann M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1544-57. PubMed ID: 25832192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention. Shomstein S; Yantis S Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Apr; 11(2):247-53. PubMed ID: 15260189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Saccade latency indexes exogenous and endogenous object-based attention. Şentürk G; Greenberg AS; Liu T Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1998-2013. PubMed ID: 27225468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The disengage deficit in hemispatial neglect is restricted to between-object shifts and is abolished by prism adaptation. Schindler I; McIntosh RD; Cassidy TP; Birchall D; Benson V; Ietswaart M; Milner AD Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(3):499-510. PubMed ID: 18854994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Visual working memory load disrupts the space-based attentional guidance of target selection. Berggren N; Eimer M Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):357-371. PubMed ID: 29943810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention. Roberts KL; Humphreys GW Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Spatial distribution of attentional bias in visuo-spatial working memory following multiple cues. Botta F; Lupiáñez J Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():1-13. PubMed ID: 24793127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Visual field meridians modulate the reallocation of object-based attention. Barnas AJ; Greenberg AS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1985-97. PubMed ID: 27150614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Spatial attention and object-based attention: a comparison within a single task. Soto D; Blanco MJ Vision Res; 2004 Jan; 44(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 14599572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The influence of object similarity on real object-based attention: The disassociation of perceptual and semantic similarity. Hu S; Liu D; Song F; Wang Y; Zhao J Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Apr; 205():103046. PubMed ID: 32143062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Same-location costs in peripheral cueing: The role of cue awareness and feature changes. Schoeberl T; Ditye T; Ansorge U J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):433-451. PubMed ID: 28816482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Attention does not spread automatically along objects: Evidence from the pupillary light response. Luzardo F; Einhäuser W; Michl M; Yeshurun Y J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jul; 152(7):2040-2051. PubMed ID: 36848107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]