456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32495453)
1. Accuracy of Implant Placement Position Using Nondental Open-Source Software: An In Vitro Study.
Talmazov G; Bencharit S; Waldrop TC; Ammoun R
J Prosthodont; 2020 Aug; 29(7):604-610. PubMed ID: 32495453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems: An in vitro study.
Yeung M; Abdulmajeed A; Carrico CK; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):821-828. PubMed ID: 31653399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intaglio Surface Dimension and Guide Tube Deviations of Implant Surgical Guides Influenced by Printing Layer Thickness and Angulation Setting.
Dalal N; Ammoun R; Abdulmajeed AA; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):161-165. PubMed ID: 31886914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study.
Herschdorfer L; Negreiros WM; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of Metal Guide Sleeves on the Accuracy and Precision of Dental Implant Placement Using Guided Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study.
Adams CR; Ammoun R; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 35257456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed.
Bell CK; Sahl EF; Kim YJ; Rice DD
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.
Tan PLB; Layton DM; Wise SL
Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.
Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of guided implant surgery obtained using 3D-printed surgical guides - An in vitro comparison of four evaluation methods.
Herstell H; Berndt S; Kühne C; Reich S
Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Jul; 25(2):161-172. PubMed ID: 35851354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fixation Pins Increase the Accuracy of Implant Surgery in Free-End Models: An In Vitro Study.
Chen X; Yang Z; Wang Y; Fu G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 May; 81(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 36716792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of a chairside, fused deposition modeling three-dimensional-printed, single tooth surgical guide for implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Sun Y; Ding Q; Yuan F; Zhang L; Sun Y; Xie Q
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Oct; 33(10):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 35852859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional accuracy of partially guided implant surgery based on dental magnetic resonance imaging.
Schwindling FS; Juerchott A; Boehm S; Rues S; Kronsteiner D; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Rammelsberg P; Hilgenfeld T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Oct; 32(10):1218-1227. PubMed ID: 34352147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of surgical guides from 2 different desktop 3D printers for computed tomography-guided surgery.
Gjelvold B; Mahmood DJH; Wennerberg A
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 30442377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Precision and trueness of implant placement with and without static surgical guides: An in vitro study.
Guentsch A; Sukhtankar L; An H; Luepke PG
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 32893013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An
Sharma A; Agarwal SK; Parkash H; Mehra P; Nagpal A
Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(2):254-260. PubMed ID: 31169159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery Using an Intraoral Scanner and Desktop 3D-Printed Tooth-Supported Guides.
D'haese R; Vrombaut T; Hommez G; De Bruyn H; Vandeweghe S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):479-484. PubMed ID: 35727238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of static fully guided implant placement in the posterior area of partially edentulous jaws: a cohort prospective study.
Gargallo-Albiol J; Zilleruelo-Pozo MJ; Lucas-Taulé E; Muñoz-Peñalver J; Paternostro-Betancourt D; Hernandez-Alfaro F
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):2783-2791. PubMed ID: 34782925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
