These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3249664)

  • 1. The effect of feature uncertainty on spatial discriminations.
    Vogels R; Eeckhout H; Orban GA
    Perception; 1988; 17(5):565-77. PubMed ID: 3249664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrimination of spatiotemporal patterns: the role of sustained and transient mechanisms.
    Shulman G; Mulvanny P
    Perception; 1983; 12(5):531-43. PubMed ID: 6676703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expectancy effects on spatial frequency processing.
    Sowden PT; Ozgen E; Schyns PG; Daoutis C
    Vision Res; 2003 Dec; 43(26):2759-72. PubMed ID: 14568093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory.
    Briand KA; Klein RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 May; 13(2):228-41. PubMed ID: 2953853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intertrial repetition facilitates selection in time: common mechanisms underlie spatial and temporal search.
    Yashar A; Lamy D
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):243-51. PubMed ID: 20424053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Masking by object substitution: dissociation of masking and cuing effects.
    Neill WT; Hutchison KA; Graves DF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):682-94. PubMed ID: 12075896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of high and low spatial frequencies: a facial recognition task.
    Keenan PA; Whitman RD; Pepe J
    Brain Cogn; 1989 Nov; 11(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 2803762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of spatially directed attention on visual encoding.
    Reinitz MT
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 May; 47(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 2349062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors limiting large-scale localisation.
    Sterken Y; Toet A; Yap YL
    Perception; 1994; 23(6):709-26. PubMed ID: 7845763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemispheric asymmetries for spatial frequency discrimination in a selective attention task.
    Proverbio AM; Zani A; Avella C
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 9220094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual and cognitive load interact to control the spatial focus of attention.
    Linnell KJ; Caparos S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1643-8. PubMed ID: 21767051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality.
    Downing CJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 May; 14(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 2967876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noise exclusion in spatial attention.
    Dosher BA; Lu ZL
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Mar; 11(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 11273421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of intertrial interval, orientation, and adaptation on orientation discrimination measured with a yes-no signal detection paradigm.
    Valle V; Rivera RM; Matin E
    Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Dec; 59(3):743-8. PubMed ID: 6522190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial cueing and the relation between the accuracy of "where" and "what" decisions in visual search.
    Müller HJ; Rabbitt PM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1989 Nov; 41(4):747-73. PubMed ID: 2587797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vision outside the focus of attention.
    Braun J; Sagi D
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jul; 48(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 2377439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial-frequency uncertainty and cuing effects on psychometric functions for contrast detection.
    Ohtani Y; Mori S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 12120789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual search for a tilted target: tests of spatial uncertainty models.
    Morgan MJ; Ward RM; Castet E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 May; 51(2):347-70. PubMed ID: 9621843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does attention have different effects on line orientation and line arrangement discrimination?
    Cheal M; Lyon DR; Hubbard DC
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Nov; 43(4):825-57. PubMed ID: 1775666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.