189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3249668)
1. The role of monocular regions in stereoscopic displays.
Gillam B; Borsting E
Perception; 1988; 17(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 3249668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learning to see random-dot stereograms.
O'Toole AJ; Kersten DJ
Perception; 1992; 21(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 1513672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial judgments with monoscopic and stereoscopic presentation of perspective displays.
Yeh YY; Silverstein LD
Hum Factors; 1992 Oct; 34(5):583-600. PubMed ID: 1459568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stereoscopic depth: its relation to image segmentation, grouping, and the recognition of occluded objects.
Nakayama K; Shimojo S; Silverman GH
Perception; 1989; 18(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 2771595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Depth inversion despite stereopsis: the appearance of random-dot stereograms on surfaces seen in reverse perspective.
Yellott JI; Kaiwi JL
Perception; 1979; 8(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 471677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monocular stereopsis with and without head movement.
Ono H; Steinbach MJ
Percept Psychophys; 1990 Aug; 48(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 2385492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stereo and motion cues in preattentive vision processing--some experiments with random-dot stereographic image sequences.
Pong TC; Kenner MA; Otis J
Perception; 1990; 19(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 2235284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phantom surface captures stereopsis.
Häkkinen J; Nyman G
Vision Res; 2001 Jan; 41(2):187-99. PubMed ID: 11163853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perspective, orientation disparity, and anisotropy in stereoscopic slant perception.
Gillam B; Ryan C
Perception; 1992; 21(4):427-39. PubMed ID: 1437462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stereoscopic depth and the occlusion illusion.
Palmer SE; Schloss KB
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1083-94. PubMed ID: 19525539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporal properties of disparity processing revealed by dynamic random-dot stereograms.
Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
Perception; 2005; 34(10):1205-19. PubMed ID: 16309115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Occlusion and the distortion of alignment in three-dimensional space.
Daniels V; Gordon IE
Perception; 1993; 22(9):1037-44. PubMed ID: 8041586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stereoscopic perception with brief exposures.
Uttal WR; Davis NS; Welke C
Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):599-604. PubMed ID: 7991356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stereopsis impairment during smooth pursuit eye tracking.
Vardi N; Hadani I
Brain Behav Evol; 1989; 33(2-3):99-103. PubMed ID: 2758310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stereoscopic surface interpolation supports lightness constancy.
Wilcox LM; Duke PA
Psychol Sci; 2003 Sep; 14(5):525-30. PubMed ID: 12930488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Content and context of monocular regions determine perceived depth in random dot, unpaired background and phantom stereograms.
Grove PM; Gillam B; Ono H
Vision Res; 2002 Jul; 42(15):1859-70. PubMed ID: 12128016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary depth cues and background pattern in the portrayal of slant.
Reinhardt-Rutland AH
J Gen Psychol; 1992 Jan; 119(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 1613487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pre-attentive detection of a target defined by stereoscopic slant.
Holliday IE; Braddick OJ
Perception; 1991; 20(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 1762877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Localization of monocular stimuli in different depth planes.
Shimono K; Tam WJ; Asakura N; Ohmi M
Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(20):2631-41. PubMed ID: 16005487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Varying the strength of the Munker-White effect by stereoscopic viewing.
Taya R; Ehrenstein WH; Cavonius CR
Perception; 1995; 24(6):685-94. PubMed ID: 7478908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
