189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3249668)
21. Pseudoscopic viewing: transfer and persistence of reversed depth relations from the viewing of photographs to the real scene.
Kalaugher PG
Perception; 1987; 16(3):359-74. PubMed ID: 3432031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Does monocular visual space contain planes?
Koenderink JJ; Albertazzi L; van Doorn AJ; van Ee R; van de Grind WA; Kappers AM; Lappin JS; Norman JF; Stijn Oomes AH; te Pas SP; Phillips F; Pont SC; Richards WA; Todd JT; Verstraten FA; de Vries S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 20053390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Binocular depth from surfaces versus volumes.
Brookes A; Stevens KA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):479-84. PubMed ID: 2527956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Asymmetrical effect of crossed and uncrossed disparity on stereoscopic capture.
Ishigushi A; Wolfe JM
Perception; 1993; 22(12):1403-13. PubMed ID: 8090618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis.
Gillam B; Chambers D; Russo T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 May; 14(2):163-75. PubMed ID: 2967874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The visual perception of surface orientation from optical motion.
Todd JT; Perotti VJ
Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1577-89. PubMed ID: 10598471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The eyeglass reversal.
Oh S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1336-43. PubMed ID: 21448766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Refractive error and monocular viewing strengthen the hollow-face illusion.
Hill H; Palmisano S; Matthews H
Perception; 2012; 41(10):1281-5. PubMed ID: 23469708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of depth information on a bistable spiral-motion aftereffect.
Wright RD; Day RW
Perception; 1993; 22(7):767-9. PubMed ID: 8115235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does visual texture discrimination precede binocular fusion?
Frisby JP; Mayhew JE
Perception; 1979; 8(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 471679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Non-stereoscopic cues in the Random-Dot E stereotest: results for adult observers.
Fricke T; Siderov J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Mar; 17(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 9196674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception.
Rogers B; Graham M
Perception; 1979; 8(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 471676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Object-based connectedness facilitates matching.
Koning A; van Lier R
Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1094-102. PubMed ID: 14674635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Depth scaling in phantom and monocular gap stereograms using absolute distance information.
Kuroki D; Nakamizo S
Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4206-16. PubMed ID: 17045325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Illusions within an Illusion.
Deręgowski JB
Perception; 2015 Dec; 44(12):1416-21. PubMed ID: 26562856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Monocular depth effects on perceptual fading.
Hsu LC; Kramer P; Yeh SL
Vision Res; 2010 Aug; 50(17):1649-55. PubMed ID: 20580732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant.
Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ
Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Phantom surfaces in da Vinci stereopsis.
Wardle SG; Gillam BJ
J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):16. PubMed ID: 23397041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Discrimination of motion in depth trajectory following acute alcohol ingestion.
Neill RA; Delahunty AM; Fenelon B
Biol Psychol; 1991 Aug; 31(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 2021677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
