108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32496849)
1. Reproducibility-optimized detection of differential DNA methylation.
Suni V; Seyednasrollah F; Ghimire B; Junttila S; Laiho A; Elo LL
Epigenomics; 2020 May; 12(9):747-755. PubMed ID: 32496849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Detecting differential DNA methylation from sequencing of bisulfite converted DNA of diverse species.
Huh I; Wu X; Park T; Yi SV
Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jan; 20(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 28981571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Next-generation sequencing methylation profiling of subjects with obesity identifies novel gene changes.
Day SE; Coletta RL; Kim JY; Campbell LE; Benjamin TR; Roust LR; De Filippis EA; Dinu V; Shaibi GQ; Mandarino LJ; Coletta DK
Clin Epigenetics; 2016; 8():77. PubMed ID: 27437034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methods for identifying differentially methylated regions for sequence- and array-based data.
Chen DP; Lin YC; Fann CS
Brief Funct Genomics; 2016 Nov; 15(6):485-490. PubMed ID: 27323952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing Distribution and Variation of Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Using Short-Read Sequencing.
Hagmann J; Becker C
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1610():61-72. PubMed ID: 28439857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. RASSF1A promoter methylation and expression analysis in normal and neoplastic kidney indicates a role in early tumorigenesis.
Peters I; Rehmet K; Wilke N; Kuczyk MA; Hennenlotter J; Eilers T; Machtens S; Jonas U; Serth J
Mol Cancer; 2007 Jul; 6():49. PubMed ID: 17634119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical method evaluation for differentially methylated CpGs in base resolution next-generation DNA sequencing data.
Zhang Y; Baheti S; Sun Z
Brief Bioinform; 2018 May; 19(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28040747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DMRfinder: efficiently identifying differentially methylated regions from MethylC-seq data.
Gaspar JM; Hart RP
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):528. PubMed ID: 29187143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methods for CpG Methylation Array Profiling Via Bisulfite Conversion.
Leti F; Llaci L; Malenica I; DiStefano JK
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1706():233-254. PubMed ID: 29423802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cost-effective approach to DNA methylation detection by Methyl Sensitive DArT sequencing.
Pereira WJ; Pappas MCR; Grattapaglia D; Pappas GJ
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233800. PubMed ID: 32497070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. BSPAT: a fast online tool for DNA methylation co-occurrence pattern analysis based on high-throughput bisulfite sequencing data.
Hu K; Ting AH; Li J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 16():220. PubMed ID: 26163275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A classification approach for DNA methylation profiling with bisulfite next-generation sequencing data.
Cheng L; Zhu Y
Bioinformatics; 2014 Jan; 30(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 24273245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comprehensive evaluation of alignment software for reduced representation bisulfite sequencing data.
Sun X; Han Y; Zhou L; Chen E; Lu B; Liu Y; Pan X; Cowley AW; Liang M; Wu Q; Lu Y; Liu P
Bioinformatics; 2018 Aug; 34(16):2715-2723. PubMed ID: 29579198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Targeted DNA methylation analysis by next-generation sequencing.
Masser DR; Stanford DR; Freeman WM
J Vis Exp; 2015 Feb; (96):. PubMed ID: 25741966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. von Hippel-Lindau exonic methylation analysis using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
Lian F; Sreedharan S; Arnold RS; Master VA; Ogan K; Pattaras JG; Roberts DL; Petros JA
J Urol; 2014 Nov; 192(5):1528-33. PubMed ID: 24704013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methylation-specific oligonucleotide microarray: a new potential for high-throughput methylation analysis.
Gitan RS; Shi H; Chen CM; Yan PS; Huang TH
Genome Res; 2002 Jan; 12(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 11779841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genome-wide screen for differential DNA methylation associated with neural cell differentiation in mouse.
Cortese R; Lewin J; Bäckdahl L; Krispin M; Wasserkort R; Eckhardt F; Beck S
PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e26002. PubMed ID: 22028803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exemplary multiplex bisulfite amplicon data used to demonstrate the utility of Methpat.
Wong NC; Pope BJ; Candiloro I; Korbie D; Trau M; Wong SQ; Mikeska T; van Denderen BJ; Thompson EW; Eggers S; Doyle SR; Dobrovic A
Gigascience; 2015; 4():55. PubMed ID: 26613017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A survey of the approaches for identifying differential methylation using bisulfite sequencing data.
Shafi A; Mitrea C; Nguyen T; Draghici S
Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):737-753. PubMed ID: 28334228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimized reduced representation bisulfite sequencing reveals tissue-specific mCHH islands in maize.
Hsu FM; Yen MR; Wang CT; Lin CY; Wang CR; Chen PY
Epigenetics Chromatin; 2017 Aug; 10(1):42. PubMed ID: 28854962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
