292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32498403)
1. Assessing the Quality of Heart Rate Variability Estimated from Wrist and Finger PPG: A Novel Approach Based on Cross-Mapping Method.
Nardelli M; Vanello N; Galperti G; Greco A; Scilingo EP
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 32498403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal fiducial points for pulse rate variability analysis from forehead and finger photoplethysmographic signals.
Peralta E; Lazaro J; Bailon R; Marozas V; Gil E
Physiol Meas; 2019 Feb; 40(2):025007. PubMed ID: 30669123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A low-complexity PPG pulse detection method for accurate estimation of the pulse rate variability (PRV) during sudden decreases in the signal amplitude.
Argüello Prada EJ; Paredes Higinio A
Physiol Meas; 2020 Apr; 41(3):035001. PubMed ID: 32079008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wearable Ring-Shaped Biomedical Device for Physiological Monitoring through Finger-Based Acquisition of Electrocardiographic, Photoplethysmographic, and Galvanic Skin Response Signals: Design and Preliminary Measurements.
Volpes G; Valenti S; Genova G; Barà C; Parisi A; Faes L; Busacca A; Pernice R
Biosensors (Basel); 2024 Apr; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 38667198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of heart rate variability signal features derived from electrocardiography and photoplethysmography in healthy individuals.
Bolanos M; Nazeran H; Haltiwanger E
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4289-94. PubMed ID: 17946618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of using different algorithms and fiducial points for the detection of interbeat intervals, and different sampling rates on the assessment of pulse rate variability from photoplethysmography.
Mejía-Mejía E; May JM; Kyriacou PA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 May; 218():106724. PubMed ID: 35255373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of Short-Term Heart Rate Variability Indexes Assessed through Photoplethysmography.
Pernice R; Javorka M; Krohova J; Czippelova B; Turianikova Z; Busacca A; Faes L
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():5610-5513. PubMed ID: 30441608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of Pulse Rate Variability in Elderly Men and Women: an Application of Cross-Mapping Approach.
Nardelli M; Greco A; Vanello N; Scilingo EP
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():492-495. PubMed ID: 34891340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Filtering of Photoplethysmography Signals in Pulse Rate Variability Analysis
Mejia-Mejia E; May JM; Kyriacou PA
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():5500-5503. PubMed ID: 34892370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationships between heart-rate variability and pulse-rate variability obtained from video-PPG signal using ZCA.
Iozzia L; Cerina L; Mainardi L
Physiol Meas; 2016 Nov; 37(11):1934-1944. PubMed ID: 27681456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the PPG Sampling Rate in the Pulse Rate Variability Indices Evaluating Several Fiducial Points in Different Pulse Waveforms.
Pelaez-Coca MD; Hernando A; Lazaro J; Gil E
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2022 Feb; 26(2):539-549. PubMed ID: 34310329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of HRV parameters derived from photoplethysmography and electrocardiography signals.
Jeyhani V; Mahdiani S; Peltokangas M; Vehkaoja A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():5952-5. PubMed ID: 26737647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pulse Rate Variability Analysis Using Remote Photoplethysmography Signals.
Yu SG; Kim SE; Kim NH; Suh KH; Lee EC
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 34577448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term pulse rate variability is better characterized by functional near-infrared spectroscopy than by photoplethysmography.
Holper L; Seifritz E; Scholkmann F
J Biomed Opt; 2016 Sep; 21(9):091308. PubMed ID: 27185106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of photoplethysmogram measured from wrist and finger and the effect of measurement location on pulse arrival time.
Rajala S; Lindholm H; Taipalus T
Physiol Meas; 2018 Aug; 39(7):075010. PubMed ID: 29794339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coherence between Decomposed Components of Wrist and Finger PPG Signals by Imputing Missing Features and Resolving Ambiguous Features.
Tsai PY; Huang CH; Guo JW; Li YC; Wu AA; Lin HJ; Wang TD
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jun; 21(13):. PubMed ID: 34202597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of short-term heart rate variability indexes evaluated through electrocardiographic and continuous blood pressure monitoring.
Pernice R; Javorka M; Krohova J; Czippelova B; Turianikova Z; Busacca A; Faes L;
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Jun; 57(6):1247-1263. PubMed ID: 30730027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finger and forehead PPG signal comparison for respiratory rate estimation.
Hernando A; Peláez-Coca MD; Lozano MT; Lázaro J; Gil E
Physiol Meas; 2019 Sep; 40(9):095007. PubMed ID: 31422948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wireless photoplethysmographic device for heart rate variability signal acquisition and analysis.
Reyes I; Nazeran H; Franco M; Haltiwanger E
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():2092-5. PubMed ID: 23366333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of acquisition frame-rate and video compression techniques on pulse-rate variability estimation from vPPG signal.
Cerina L; Iozzia L; Mainardi L
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2019 Feb; 64(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 29135450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
