These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32498646)

  • 1. Electric-acoustic stimulation with longer electrodes for potential deterioration in low-frequency hearing.
    Yoshimura H; Moteki H; Nishio SY; Usami SI
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 140(8):632-638. PubMed ID: 32498646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chronic Electro-Acoustic Stimulation May Interfere With Electric Threshold Recovery After Cochlear Implantation in the Aged Guinea Pig.
    Reiss LAJ; Lawrence MB; Omelchenko IA; He W; Kirk JR
    Ear Hear; 2024 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):1554-1567. PubMed ID: 38992863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array.
    Helbig S; Van de Heyning P; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Gstoettner W
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 21281057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term residual hearing in cochlear implanted adult patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Mamelle E; Granger B; Sterkers O; Lahlou G; Ferrary E; Nguyen Y; Mosnier I
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 277(3):705-713. PubMed ID: 31802226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
    Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feasibility of hearing preservation for residual hearing with longer cochlear implant electrodes.
    Moteki H; Nishio SY; Miyagawa M; Tsukada K; Noguchi Y; Usami SI
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 138(12):1080-1085. PubMed ID: 30702034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integration of acoustic and electric hearing is better in the same ear than across ears.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ; Wang X
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):12500. PubMed ID: 28970567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Helbig S; Adel Y; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 29912820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):631-645. PubMed ID: 34593687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electric acoustic stimulation in patients with postlingual severe high-frequency hearing loss: clinical experience.
    Arnoldner C; Helbig S; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS; Riss D; Gstoettner W
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():116-124. PubMed ID: 19955728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical approach for complete cochlear coverage in EAS-patients after residual hearing loss.
    Weiss NM; Dhanasingh A; Schraven SP; Schulze M; Langner S; Mlynski R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0223121. PubMed ID: 31557251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bilateral electric acoustic stimulation: a comparison of partial and deep cochlear electrode insertion. A longitudinal case study.
    Kleine Punte A; Vermeire K; Van de Heyning P
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():144-152. PubMed ID: 19955731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EAS-Combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Dhanasingh A; Hochmair I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 141(sup1):22-62. PubMed ID: 33818263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch: Characterizing Variability and the Influence on Speech Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD; O'Connell BP
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1349-1361. PubMed ID: 32205726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors associated with hearing loss in a normal-hearing guinea pig model of Hybrid cochlear implants.
    Tanaka C; Nguyen-Huynh A; Loera K; Stark G; Reiss L
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():82-93. PubMed ID: 25128626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined electro-acoustic stimulation: a beneficial union?
    Talbot KN; Hartley DE
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):536-45. PubMed ID: 19126127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.