334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32498699)
1. The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol.
McClinton S; Starr K; Thomas R; MacLennan G; Lam T; Hernandez R; Pickard R; Anson K; Clark T; MacLennan S; Thomas D; Smith D; Turney B; McDonald A; Cameron S; Wiseman O
Trials; 2020 Jun; 21(1):479. PubMed ID: 32498699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopic stone treatment for adults with ureteric stones: the TISU non-inferiority RCT.
Dasgupta R; Cameron S; Aucott L; MacLennan G; Kilonzo MM; Lam TB; Thomas R; Norrie J; McDonald A; Anson K; N'Dow J; Burgess N; Clark CT; Keeley FX; MacLennan SJ; Starr K; McClinton S
Health Technol Assess; 2022 Mar; 26(19):1-70. PubMed ID: 35301982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.
Chan LH; Good DW; Laing K; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Keanie JY; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):510-516. PubMed ID: 28355100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. TISU: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, as first treatment option, compared with direct progression to ureteroscopic treatment, for ureteric stones: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
McClinton S; Cameron S; Starr K; Thomas R; MacLennan G; McDonald A; Lam T; N'Dow J; Kilonzo M; Pickard R; Anson K; Keeley F; Burgess N; Clark CT; MacLennan S; Norrie J;
Trials; 2018 May; 19(1):286. PubMed ID: 29788982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for high-density, renal stones: a prospective, randomised trial.
Ahmed AF; Abdelazim H; ElMesery M; El-Feky M; Gomaa A; Tagreda I; Abozied H; Fahim A
BJU Int; 2021 Dec; 128(6):744-751. PubMed ID: 34028170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Setthawong V; Laopaiboon M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Nov; (11):CD007044. PubMed ID: 25418417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower-pole stones.
Knoll T; Buchholz N; Wendt-Nordahl G
Arab J Urol; 2012 Sep; 10(3):336-41. PubMed ID: 26558046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
Setthawong V; Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Pattanittum P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Aug; 8(8):CD007044. PubMed ID: 37526261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Setthawong V; Laopaiboon M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007044. PubMed ID: 19821393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.
Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B
BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1913-6. PubMed ID: 21453346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, Standard and Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the Management of 1-2cm Renal Stones.
Wymer KM; Sharma V; Juvet T; Klett DE; Borah BJ; Koo K; Rivera M; Agarwal D; Humphreys MR; Potretzke AM
Urology; 2021 Oct; 156():71-77. PubMed ID: 34274389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Staged retrograde flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones of 2-4 cm in diameter: a randomized controlled trial].
Li JW; Wang F; Cai FZ; Gao HZ
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1672-1676. PubMed ID: 27998863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective study of single-use digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1.5-2.5cm lower pole renal stones.
Meng W; Zhang H; Wang J; Chen B; Jiang Z; Ma L; Guan Y
Int Urol Nephrol; 2024 Jan; 56(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 37656387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
Junbo L; Yugen L; Guo J; Jing H; Ruichao Y; Tao W
Urol J; 2019 May; 16(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 30604405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal management of large proximal ureteral stones (>10 mm): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials.
Lai S; Jiao B; Diao T; Seery S; Hu M; Wang M; Hou H; Wang J; Zhang G; Liu M
Int J Surg; 2020 Aug; 80():205-217. PubMed ID: 32622059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring.
Desai M; Sun Y; Buchholz N; Fuller A; Matsuda T; Matlaga B; Miller N; Bolton D; Alomar M; Ganpule A
World J Urol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 28303335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopic Treatment as Therapeutic Interventions for Stones of the Ureter (TISU): A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial.
Dasgupta R; Cameron S; Aucott L; MacLennan G; Thomas RE; Kilonzo MM; Lam TBL; N'Dow J; Norrie J; Anson K; Burgess N; Clark CT; Keeley FX; MacLennan SJ; Starr K; McClinton S
Eur Urol; 2021 Jul; 80(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 33810921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The feasibility of ultrasound-guided mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for ESWL-resistant lower calyx renal stones of up to two centimeters: a single center experience.
Sabhan AH; Alwan AAA
J Med Life; 2023 Apr; 16(4):520-525. PubMed ID: 37305831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
