These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32498960)

  • 1. Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Report of 2 Cases in 315 Procedures.
    Olinger CR; Gardocki RJ
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2020 Jul; 51(3):423-425. PubMed ID: 32498960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of pneumatic compression stocking prophylaxis in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism following 139 lumbar laminectomies with instrumented fusions.
    Epstein NE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Feb; 19(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 16462215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS AND CHANGE OF SAGITTAL SPINO-PELVIC PARAMETERS BETWEEN MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL AND CONVENTIONAL OPEN POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSIONS IN TREATMENT OF LOW-DEGREE ISTHMIC LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS].
    Sun X; Zeng R; Li G; Wei B; Hu Z; Lin H; Chen G; Chen S; Sun J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 29(12):1504-9. PubMed ID: 27044219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hospital charges associated with "never events": comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and lumbar laminectomy to total joint arthroplasty.
    Daniels AH; Kawaguchi S; Contag AG; Rastegar F; Waagmeester G; Anderson PA; Arthur M; Hart RA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 26989978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraoperative reduction does not result in better outcomes in low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with neurogenic symptoms after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-a 5-year follow-up study.
    Tay KS; Bassi A; Yeo W; Yue WM
    Spine J; 2016 Feb; 16(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 26515392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of surgical level on self-reported clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: L4-L5 versus L5-S1.
    Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Dahdaleh NS; Wong AP; Khanna R; Barnawi A; Fessler RG
    World Neurosurg; 2014 Jan; 81(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 23916495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Complete anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis of Grade II and higher: use of the minimally invasive "rocking" technique.
    Rajakumar DV; Hari A; Krishna M; Sharma A; Reddy M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E12. PubMed ID: 28760034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.
    Nandyala SV; Fineberg SJ; Pelton M; Singh K
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1460-5. PubMed ID: 24290313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally Invasive Computer Navigation-Assisted Endoscopic Transforaminal Interbody Fusion with Bilateral Decompression via a Unilateral Approach: Initial Clinical Experience at One-Year Follow-Up.
    Zhang Y; Xu C; Zhou Y; Huang B
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 106():291-299. PubMed ID: 28710043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Establishment and Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway Tailored for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery.
    Feng C; Zhang Y; Chong F; Yang M; Liu C; Liu L; Huang C; Huang C; Feng X; Wang X; Chu T; Zhou Y; Huang B
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Sep; 129():e317-e323. PubMed ID: 31132490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up.
    Kolcun JPG; Brusko GD; Basil GW; Epstein R; Wang MY
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E14. PubMed ID: 30933915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.
    Wong AP; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Lawton CD; Dahdaleh NS; Wong RH; Auffinger B; Lam S; Song JK; Liu JC; Koski TR; Fessler RG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 25700243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion in patients older than 70 years of age: analysis of peri- and postoperative complications.
    Karikari IO; Grossi PM; Nimjee SM; Hardin C; Hodges TR; Hughes BD; Brown CR; Isaacs RE
    Neurosurgery; 2011 Apr; 68(4):897-902; discussion 902. PubMed ID: 21221024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Considerations When Contemplating Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Chou D
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1205-6. PubMed ID: 26141746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.
    Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical and Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery in an Unselected Patient Cohort of a Spinal Care Unit.
    Senker W; Gruber A; Gmeiner M; Stefanits H; Sander K; Rössler P; Pflugmacher R
    Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 10(3):192-197. PubMed ID: 30152613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Baek OK; Lee SH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 May; 22(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 19412026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.