These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32499297)

  • 21. Measurement of Quality of Life in Patients with Mycosis Fungoides/Sézary Syndrome Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: Development of an Electronic Instrument.
    McCaffrey S; Black RA; Nagao M; Sepassi M; Sharma G; Thornton S; Kim YH; Braverman J
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jan; 21(1):e11302. PubMed ID: 30617041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine the minimally important difference on patient-reported outcome questionnaires in oncology: a structured review.
    Ousmen A; Touraine C; Deliu N; Cottone F; Bonnetain F; Efficace F; Brédart A; Mollevi C; Anota A
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Dec; 16(1):228. PubMed ID: 30537955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Domain Scales.
    Lapin B; Thompson NR; Schuster A; Katzan IL
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e004753. PubMed ID: 30587028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement?
    Lyman S; Lee YY; McLawhorn AS; Islam W; MacLean CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2432-2441. PubMed ID: 30179951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of anchor-based methods for estimating thresholds of meaningful within-patient change using simulated PROMIS PF 20a data under various joint distribution characteristic conditions.
    Qin S; Nelson L; Williams N; Williams V; Bender R; McLeod L
    Qual Life Res; 2023 May; 32(5):1277-1293. PubMed ID: 36371770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of anchor modality on the reliability of vocal severity ratings.
    Awan SN; Lawson LL
    J Voice; 2009 May; 23(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 18346869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Psychometric Evaluation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptom Diary for Varicose Veins: VVSymQ(®) Instrument.
    Wright DD; Paty J; Turner-Bowker DM; Bradbury A
    Patient; 2016 Aug; 9(4):335-48. PubMed ID: 27016239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Endoscopic scoring indices for evaluation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis.
    Mohammed Vashist N; Samaan M; Mosli MH; Parker CE; MacDonald JK; Nelson SA; Zou GY; Feagan BG; Khanna R; Jairath V
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 1(1):CD011450. PubMed ID: 29338066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inter-rater reliability of a paediatric outcome measure in Nepal.
    Beach C; Boyce W; Peat M; Malakar S
    Int J Rehabil Res; 1995; 18(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 7797319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach.
    de Vet HC; Ostelo RW; Terwee CB; van der Roer N; Knol DL; Beckerman H; Boers M; Bouter LM
    Qual Life Res; 2007 Feb; 16(1):131-42. PubMed ID: 17033901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Modular Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Electronic Assessment and Treatment Monitoring: Web-Based Development and Psychometric Validation of Core Thrive Items.
    Wicks P; McCaffrey S; Goodwin K; Black R; Hoole M; Heywood J
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jan; 21(1):e12075. PubMed ID: 30681962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluating clinically meaningful change on the ITP-PAQ: preliminary estimates of minimal important differences.
    Mathias SD; Gao SK; Rutstein M; Snyder CF; Wu AW; Cella D
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 19192982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interpreting European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 scores as minimally importantly different for patients with malignant melanoma.
    Musoro JZ; Bottomley A; Coens C; Eggermont AM; King MT; Cocks K; Sprangers MA; Groenvold M; Velikova G; Flechtner HH; Brandberg Y;
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():169-181. PubMed ID: 30359910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Establishing Minimal Important Differences for the VR-12 and SANE Scores in Patients Following Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears.
    Zhou L; Natarajan M; Miller BS; Gagnier JJ
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 6(7):2325967118782159. PubMed ID: 30090834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development and Initial Validation of the PROMIS®-Plus-HF Profile Measure.
    Ahmad FS; Kallen MA; Schifferdecker KE; Carluzzo KL; Yount SE; Gelow JM; McCullough PA; Kimmel SE; Fisher ES; Cella D
    Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Jun; 12(6):e005751. PubMed ID: 31163985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D.
    Walters SJ; Brazier JE
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2003 Apr; 1():4. PubMed ID: 12737635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The multiligament quality of life questionnaire: development and evaluation of test-retest reliability and validity in patients with multiligament knee injuries.
    Chahal J; Whelan DB; Jaglal SB; Smith P; MacDonald PB; Levy BA; Davis AM
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Dec; 42(12):2906-16. PubMed ID: 25288625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale.
    Eton DT; Cella D; Yost KJ; Yount SE; Peterman AH; Neuberg DS; Sledge GW; Wood WC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):898-910. PubMed ID: 15504633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches.
    Yost KJ; Cella D; Chawla A; Holmgren E; Eton DT; Ayanian JZ; West DW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 58(12):1241-51. PubMed ID: 16291468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating test-retest reliability in patient-reported outcome measures for older people: A systematic review.
    Park MS; Kang KJ; Jang SJ; Lee JY; Chang SJ
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2018 Mar; 79():58-69. PubMed ID: 29178977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.