These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32500861)

  • 41. Control of occlusal rehabilitation with 3D-printed crowns.
    Höhne C; Schmitter M
    Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Sep; 25(3):325-332. PubMed ID: 36125805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A fully digital approach to replicate functional and aesthetic parameters in implant-supported full-arch rehabilitation.
    Monaco C; Ragazzini N; Scheda L; Evangelisti E
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):383-385. PubMed ID: 29191608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Time-efficiency and cost-analysis comparing three digital workflows for treatment with monolithic zirconia implant fixed dental prostheses: A double-blinded RCT.
    Joda T; Gintaute A; Brägger U; Ferrari M; Weber K; Zitzmann NU
    J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103779. PubMed ID: 34391875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A virtual patient concept for esthetic and functional rehabilitation in a fully digital workflow.
    Unkovskiy A; Unkovskiy N; Spintzyk S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):405-417. PubMed ID: 34931776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. CAD/CAM Ceramic Restorative Materials for Natural Teeth.
    Spitznagel FA; Boldt J; Gierthmuehlen PC
    J Dent Res; 2018 Sep; 97(10):1082-1091. PubMed ID: 29906206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The occlusal precision of milled versus printed provisional crowns.
    Giannetti L; Apponi R; Mordini L; Presti S; Breschi L; Mintrone F
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103924. PubMed ID: 34910962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial.
    Joda T; Brägger U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1401-1406. PubMed ID: 27796072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
    de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Simplified Fabrication of an Esthetic Implant-Supported Crown With a Novel CAD/CAM Glass Ceramic.
    Conejo J; Blatz MB
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2016 Jun; 37(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 27517477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Application of 3D-printed colored 3D-models for the fabrication of full ceramic restorations: A technical report.
    Schweiger J; Güth JF; Edelhoff D; Seidel K; Graf T
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jan; 34(1):235-243. PubMed ID: 35040541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Monolithic implant-supported lithium disilicate (LS2) crowns in a complete digital workflow: A prospective clinical trial with a 2-year follow-up.
    Joda T; Ferrari M; Brägger U
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 19(3):505-511. PubMed ID: 28093860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fracture strength of CAD/CAM posterior ceramic crowns after manual enhancement of occlusal morphology.
    Passos L; Torrealba Y; Linke B; Street A; Passos S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 30264048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
    Su TS; Sun J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.
    Zarauz C; Valverde A; Martinez-Rus F; Hassan B; Pradies G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26362778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Digital tools and 3D printing technologies integrated into the workflow of restorative treatment: A clinical report.
    Revilla-León M; Besné-Torre A; Sánchez-Rubio JL; Fábrega JJ; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 30093121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Veneered anatomically designed zirconia FDPs resulting from digital intraoral scans: Preliminary results of a prospective clinical study.
    Selz CF; Bogler J; Vach K; Strub JR; Guess PC
    J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1428-35. PubMed ID: 26523348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A Novel Full-Digital Protocol (SCAN-PLAN-MAKE-DONE
    Mangano F; Margiani B; Admakin O
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30678357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.