These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32501180)

  • 1. A template of information needs for decision-making about delaying remediation on contaminated lands to protect human health.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2020 May; 83(10):379-394. PubMed ID: 32501180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sources, pathways, and relative risks of contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a perspective prepared for the Walkerton inquiry.
    Ritter L; Solomon K; Sibley P; Hall K; Keen P; Mattu G; Linton B
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2002 Jan; 65(1):1-142. PubMed ID: 11809004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk valuation of ecological resources at contaminated deactivation and decommissioning facilities: methodology and a case study at the Department of Energy's Hanford site.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Jeitner C
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jul; 190(8):478. PubMed ID: 30030638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A decision framework for possible remediation of contaminated sediments in the River Kymijoki, Finland.
    Verta M; Kiviranta H; Salo S; Malve O; Korhonen M; Verkasalo PK; Ruokojärvi P; Rossi E; Hanski A; Päätalo K; Vartiainen T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Jan; 16(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 18941816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The costs of delaying remediation on human, ecological, and eco-cultural resources: Considerations for the Department of Energy: A methodological framework.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Bliss LS; Bunn A; Clarke JH; Mayer HJ; Salisbury JA
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 649():1054-1064. PubMed ID: 30308877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Costs and Benefits of Delaying Remediation on Ecological Resources at Contaminated Sites.
    Burger J
    Ecohealth; 2019 Sep; 16(3):454-475. PubMed ID: 31377906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contaminated Department of Energy facilities and ecosystems: weighing the ecological risks.
    Burger J
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2000 Sep; 61(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 11032427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A framework for increasing sustainability and reducing risk to ecological resources through integration of remediation planning and implementation.
    Burger J
    Environ Res; 2019 May; 172():586-595. PubMed ID: 30875512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of risk and future land use in cleanup decisions at the Department Of Energy.
    Burger J; Powers C; Greenberg M; Gochfeld M
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 15660610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shifting priorities at the Department of Energy's bomb factories: protecting human and ecological health.
    Burger J; Leschine TM; Greenberg M; Karr JR; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
    Environ Manage; 2003 Feb; 31(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 12520373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Importance of buffer lands to determining risk to ecological resources at legacy contaminated sites: A case study for the Department of Energy's Hanford Site, Washington, USA.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Jeitner C
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2019; 82(22):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 31852396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An integrated decision support system for the management of petroleum-contaminated sites.
    Li JB; Huang GH; Zeng GM
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2001; 36(7):1163-86. PubMed ID: 11545345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nanotechnology and in situ remediation: a review of the benefits and potential risks.
    Karn B; Kuiken T; Otto M
    Environ Health Perspect; 2009 Dec; 117(12):1813-31. PubMed ID: 20049198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect on ecological systems of remediation to protect human health.
    Burger J
    Am J Public Health; 2007 Sep; 97(9):1572-8. PubMed ID: 17666693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early decision framework for integrating sustainable risk management for complex remediation sites: Drivers, barriers, and performance metrics.
    Harclerode MA; Macbeth TW; Miller ME; Gurr CJ; Myers TS
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 1):57-66. PubMed ID: 27497675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Importance of implementation and residual risk analyses in sediment remediation.
    Wenning RJ; Sorensen M; Magar VS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16640319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practical radioecology support in the management and regulatory supervision of legacy sites.
    Sneve MK; Smith K; Mrdakovic Popic J
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Jun; 40(2):487-504. PubMed ID: 31829987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Making decisions about hazardous waste remediation when even considering a remediation technology is controversial.
    Wolfe AK; Bjornstad DJ; Kerchner ND
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Apr; 37(8):1485-92. PubMed ID: 12731828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using integrated geospatial mapping and conceptual site models to guide risk-based environmental clean-up decisions.
    Mayer HJ; Greenberg MR; Burger J; Gochfield M; Powers C; Kosson D; Keren R; Danis C; Vyas V
    Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):429-46. PubMed ID: 15876215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.