231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32501933)
1. The Effect of Aging on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
Mussoi BS; Brown CJ
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Aug; 41(7):e804-e811. PubMed ID: 32501933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Age-Related Changes in Temporal Resolution Revisited: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Findings From Cochlear Implant Users.
Mussoi BSS; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1328-1344. PubMed ID: 31033701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Etlert CP; O'Brient S; Oleson JJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 20085195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Relationship Between Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes and Electrophysiological Measures of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
Skidmore J; Oleson JJ; Yuan Y; He S
Ear Hear; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 44(6):1485-1497. PubMed ID: 37194125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identifying Cochlear Implant Channels With Relatively Poor Electrode-Neuron Interfaces Using the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
Jahn KN; Arenberg JG
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):961-973. PubMed ID: 31972772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Aging on Auditory Nerve Function: Insights from Intraoperative eCAP Recordings in Cochlear Implant Users.
Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Jun; 44(5):447-452. PubMed ID: 37026816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech Perception Performance in Cochlear Implant Recipients Correlates to the Number and Synchrony of Excited Auditory Nerve Fibers Derived From Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
Dong Y; Briaire JJ; Stronks HC; Frijns JHM
Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 36253905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Advanced Age on the Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Users.
Skidmore J; Carter BL; Riggs WJ; He S
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1300-1315. PubMed ID: 34935648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using the electrically-evoked compound action potential (ECAP) interphase gap effect to select electrode stimulation sites in cochlear implant users.
Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108257. PubMed ID: 34020316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrophysiological Estimates of the Electrode-Neuron Interface Differ Between Younger and Older Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
Jahn KN; Arenberg JG
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):948-960. PubMed ID: 32032228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes over time in the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) interphase gap (IPG) effect following cochlear implantation in Guinea pigs.
Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Colesa DJ; Buswinka CJ; Swiderski DL; Raphael Y; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2019 Nov; 383():107809. PubMed ID: 31630082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Aging and the Electrode-to-Neural Interface on Temporal Processing Ability in Cochlear-Implant Users: Amplitude-Modulation Detection Thresholds.
Shader MJ; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520936160. PubMed ID: 32833587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
Telmesani LM; Said NM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of auditory nerve functional states on the correlations between human and computer decisions for electrically evoked compound action potential threshold.
Li Q; Zhang C; Lu T; Xu C; Sun Z; Fan W; Wang Z; Li S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 131():109866. PubMed ID: 31945736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Growth and Maximum Amplitudes in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 36946363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Aging and the Electrode-to-Neural Interface on Temporal Processing Ability in Cochlear-Implant Users: Gap Detection Thresholds.
Shader MJ; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520956560. PubMed ID: 32941111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Late electrically-evoked compound action potentials as markers for acute micro-lesions of spiral ganglion neurons.
Konerding W; Arenberg JG; Kral A; Baumhoff P
Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 413():108057. PubMed ID: 32883545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
