These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32501933)

  • 21. Insertion trauma and recovery of function after cochlear implantation: Evidence from objective functional measures.
    Pfingst BE; Hughes AP; Colesa DJ; Watts MM; Strahl SB; Raphael Y
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):98-105. PubMed ID: 26209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Investigating the association of electrically-evoked compound action potential thresholds with inner-ear dimensions in pediatric cochlear implantation.
    Söderqvist S; Sivonen V; Lamminmäki S; Ylönen J; Markkola A; Sinkkonen ST
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jul; 158():111160. PubMed ID: 35544967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Scheperle RA; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 25658746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changes in the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential over time After Implantation and Subsequent Deafening in Guinea Pigs.
    Ramekers D; Benav H; Klis SFL; Versnel H
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Dec; 23(6):721-738. PubMed ID: 35948695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Effect of Interphase Gap on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves.
    He S; Xu L; Skidmore J; Chao X; Jeng FC; Wang R; Luo J; Wang H
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):918-934. PubMed ID: 31688319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing the Relationship Between the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and Speech Recognition Abilities in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Pfingst BE
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):344-358. PubMed ID: 28885234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and behavioral T-levels in implanted children with cochlear nerve deficiency.
    Chao X; Wang R; Luo J; Wang H; Fan Z; Xu L
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4309. PubMed ID: 36922582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of Increasing Pulse Phase Duration on Neural Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve.
    He S; Xu L; Skidmore J; Chao X; Riggs WJ; Wang R; Vaughan C; Luo J; Shannon M; Warner C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1606-1618. PubMed ID: 33136636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap.
    Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():50-65. PubMed ID: 27521841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Effects of GJB2 or SLC26A4 Gene Mutations on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve in Children.
    Luo J; Xu L; Chao X; Wang R; Pellittieri A; Bai X; Fan Z; Wang H; He S
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):194-207. PubMed ID: 31124793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A new approach for the determination of ECAP thresholds.
    Hoth S; Spitzer P; Praetorius M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):104-114. PubMed ID: 29161976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Facilitation properties in electrically evoked compound action potentials depending on spatial location and on threshold.
    Dambon J; Mewes A; Beyer A; Dambon J; Ambrosch P; Hey M
    Hear Res; 2023 Oct; 438():108858. PubMed ID: 37556897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characterizing Polarity Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Demographic Effects and Potential Implications for Estimating Neural Health.
    Hughes ML
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Apr; 23(2):301-318. PubMed ID: 34988867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing the relationship between neural health measures and speech performance with simultaneous electric stimulation in cochlear implant listeners.
    Langner F; Arenberg JG; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261295. PubMed ID: 34898654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relationships Between the Auditory Nerve Sensitivity to Amplitude Modulation, Perceptual Amplitude Modulation Rate Discrimination Sensitivity, and Speech Perception Performance in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    He S; Skidmore J; Koch B; Chatterjee M; Carter BL; Yuan Y
    Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):371-384. PubMed ID: 36342278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.