186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32501974)
1. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient measurements for differentiating glioma recurrence from pseudoprogression.
Yu Y; Ma Y; Sun M; Jiang W; Yuan T; Tong D
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jun; 99(23):e20270. PubMed ID: 32501974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The diagnostic performance of perfusion MRI for differentiating glioma recurrence from pseudoprogression: A meta-analysis.
Wan B; Wang S; Tu M; Wu B; Han P; Xu H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Mar; 96(11):e6333. PubMed ID: 28296759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing pseudoprogression from glioma recurrence: a meta-analysis.
Qiu J; Tao ZC; Deng KX; Wang P; Chen CY; Xiao F; Luo Y; Yuan SY; Chen H; Huang H
Chin Med J (Engl); 2021 Oct; 134(21):2535-2543. PubMed ID: 34748524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The utility of diffusion MRI with quantitative ADC measurements for differentiating high-grade from low-grade cerebral gliomas: Evidence from a meta-analysis.
Zhang L; Min Z; Tang M; Chen S; Lei X; Zhang X
J Neurol Sci; 2017 Feb; 373():9-15. PubMed ID: 28131237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion MRI with quantitative ADC measurements in differentiating glioma recurrence from radiation necrosis.
Zhang H; Ma L; Shu C; Wang YB; Dong LQ
J Neurol Sci; 2015 Apr; 351(1-2):65-71. PubMed ID: 25748965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of ADC derived from DWI for differentiating high-grade from low-grade gliomas: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang QP; Lei DQ; Yuan Y; Xiong NX
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Feb; 99(8):e19254. PubMed ID: 32080132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating glioma recurrence from posttreatment-related changes: a meta-analysis.
Du X; He Q; Zhang B; Li N; Zeng X; Li W
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2022 Jan; 22(1):123-130. PubMed ID: 34727815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and the Ki-67 Proliferation Index in Grading Pediatric Glioma.
Yao R; Cheng A; Zhang Z; Jin B; Yu H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 47(2):322-328. PubMed ID: 36957971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the differentiation of recurrent glioma from radiation necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang H; Ma L; Wang Q; Zheng X; Wu C; Xu BN
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Dec; 83(12):2181-2189. PubMed ID: 25452098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiation Between Recurrence and Pseudoprogression in High-Grade Glioma: A Meta-analysis.
Gu X; He X; Wang H; Li J; Chen R; Liu H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 48(2):303-310. PubMed ID: 37654056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Centrally Reduced Diffusion Sign for Differentiation between Treatment-Related Lesions and Glioma Progression: A Validation Study.
Alcaide-Leon P; Cluceru J; Lupo JM; Yu TJ; Luks TL; Tihan T; Bush NA; Villanueva-Meyer JE
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2020 Nov; 41(11):2049-2054. PubMed ID: 33060101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diffusion-weighted imaging and arterial spin labeling radiomics features may improve differentiation between radiation-induced brain injury and glioma recurrence.
Zhang J; Wu Y; Wang Y; Zhang X; Lei Y; Zhu G; Mao C; Zhang L; Ma L
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3332-3342. PubMed ID: 36576544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Method Used in Association With the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Differentiating Between Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and High-Grade Glioma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Du X; He Y; Lin W
Front Neurol; 2022; 13():882334. PubMed ID: 35812103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiation Between True Tumor Progression of Glioblastoma and Pseudoprogression Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Perfusion-Weighted Imaging: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Tsakiris C; Siempis T; Alexiou GA; Zikou A; Sioka C; Voulgaris S; Argyropoulou MI
World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e100-e109. PubMed ID: 32777397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas.
Server A; Kulle B; Gadmar ØB; Josefsen R; Kumar T; Nakstad PH
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 20708868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic Accuracy of Centrally Restricted Diffusion in the Differentiation of Treatment-Related Necrosis from Tumor Recurrence in High-Grade Gliomas.
Zakhari N; Taccone MS; Torres C; Chakraborty S; Sinclair J; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Nguyen TB
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2018 Feb; 39(2):260-264. PubMed ID: 29217742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiating high-grade glioma recurrence from pseudoprogression: Comparing diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion tensor imaging.
Wu XF; Liang X; Wang XC; Qin JB; Zhang L; Tan Y; Zhang H
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 135():109445. PubMed ID: 33341429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient parameters for glioma grading.
Wang Q; Zhang J; Xu X; Chen X; Xu B
J Neurooncol; 2018 Aug; 139(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 29574566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in differentiating malignant from benign solid liver lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nalaini F; Shahbazi F; Mousavinezhad SM; Ansari A; Salehi M
Br J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 94(1123):20210059. PubMed ID: 34111960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in differentiating high-from low-grade gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang Q; Zhang H; Zhang J; Wu C; Zhu W; Li F; Chen X; Xu B
Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2670-84. PubMed ID: 26471274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
