177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32502657)
1. Criteria for success after surgery for cervical radiculopathy-estimates for a substantial amount of improvement in core outcome measures.
Mjåset C; Zwart JA; Goedmakers CMW; Smith TR; Solberg TK; Grotle M
Spine J; 2020 Sep; 20(9):1413-1421. PubMed ID: 32502657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1203-9. PubMed ID: 24076442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical improvement after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy; A comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures during 12-month follow-up.
Mjåset C; Zwart JA; Kolstad F; Solberg T; Grotle M
PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0264954. PubMed ID: 35259164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter observational study based on data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
Werner DAT; Grotle M; Gulati S; Austevoll IM; Lønne G; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK
Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2650-2659. PubMed ID: 28616747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective national spine registry observational study.
Alhaug OK; Dolatowski FC; Solberg TK; Lønne G
Spine J; 2021 Sep; 21(9):1489-1496. PubMed ID: 33848690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial disc replacement versus fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease with radiculopathy: 5-year outcomes from the National Swedish Spine Register.
MacDowall A; Skeppholm M; Lindhagen L; Robinson Y; Löfgren H; Michaëlsson K; Olerud C
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):159-167. PubMed ID: 30485205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can we define success criteria for lumbar disc surgery? : estimates for a substantial amount of improvement in core outcome measures.
Solberg T; Johnsen LG; Nygaard ØP; Grotle M
Acta Orthop; 2013 Apr; 84(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 23506164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A nationwide study of patients operated for cervical degenerative disorders in public and private hospitals.
Danielsen E; Mjåset C; Ingebrigtsen T; Gulati S; Grotle M; Rudolfsen JH; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK
Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):12856. PubMed ID: 35896806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors related to subjective satisfaction following microendoscopic foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy.
Tonosu J; Inanami H; Oka H; Takano Y; Koga H; Yuzawa Y; Shiboi R; Oshima Y; Baba S; Tanaka S; Matsudaira K
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Jan; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 29361919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is success of treatment? Expected outcome scores in cervical radiculopathy patients were much higher than the previously reported cut-off values for success.
Taso M; Sommernes JH; Bjorland S; Zwart JA; Engebretsen KB; Sundseth J; Pripp AH; Kolstad F; Brox JI
Eur Spine J; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2761-2768. PubMed ID: 35551484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Nationwide Registry-Based Observational Study With Patient-Reported Outcomes.
Gulati S; Vangen-Lønne V; Nygaard ØP; Gulati AM; Hammer TA; Johansen TO; Peul WC; Salvesen ØO; Solberg TK
Neurosurgery; 2021 Sep; 89(4):704-711. PubMed ID: 34325471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcomes after surgery for cervical radiculopathy performed in public and private hospitals : a nationwide relative effectiveness study.
Danielsen E; Gulati S; Salvesen Ø; Ingebrigtsen T; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK
Bone Joint J; 2023 Jan; 105-B(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 36587250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How closely are outcome questionnaires correlated to patient satisfaction after cervical spine surgery for myelopathy?
Zaki MM; Joshi RS; Ibrahim S; Michalopoulos GD; Linzey JR; Saadeh YS; Upadhyaya C; Coric D; Potts EA; Bisson EF; Turner JD; Knightly JJ; Fu KM; Foley KT; Tumialan L; Shaffrey ME; Bydon M; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Chan AK; Meyer S; Asher AL; Shaffrey CI; Gottfried ON; Than KD; Wang M; Haid R; Slotkin JR; Glassman SD; Park P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 May; 38(5):521-529. PubMed ID: 36805998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of preoperative mental distress versus surgical modality, arthroplasty, or fusion on long-term outcome in patients with cervical radiculopathy.
MacDowall A; Skeppholm M; Lindhagen L; Robinson Y; Olerud C
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Oct; 29(4):371-379. PubMed ID: 30004317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: similar results to patients with only radiculopathy at 3 years' follow-up.
Fay LY; Huang WC; Wu JC; Chang HK; Tsai TY; Ko CC; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 24926929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally Invasive Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Assisted by O-Arm-Based Navigation.
Zhang C; Wu J; Xu C; Zheng W; Pan Y; Li C; Zhou Y
Pain Physician; 2018 May; 21(3):E215-E223. PubMed ID: 29871377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine).
Ingebrigtsen T; Aune G; Karlsen ME; Gulati S; Kolstad F; Nygaard ØP; Thyrhaug AM; Solberg TK
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Jan; 165(1):125-133. PubMed ID: 36539647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-Term Results After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.
Johansen TO; Holmberg ST; Danielsen E; Rao V; Salvesen ØO; Andresen H; Carmen VLA; Solberg TK; Gulati S; Nygaard ØP
Neurosurgery; 2024 Mar; 94(3):454-460. PubMed ID: 37823669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
