BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32502712)

  • 1. Three-Dimensional Zero Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography for Glenoid Bone Assessment.
    de Mello RAF; Ma YJ; Ashir A; Jerban S; Hoenecke H; Carl M; Du J; Chang EY
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Sep; 36(9):2391-2400. PubMed ID: 32502712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fast Field Echo Resembling a Computed Tomography Using Restricted Echo-Spacing Sequence Is Equivalent to 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Quantifying Bone Loss and Measuring Shoulder Morphology in Patients With Shoulder Dislocation.
    Cui DD; Long Y; Yan Y; Li C; Yang YT; Zhong JL; Yang R
    Arthroscopy; 2024 Jun; 40(6):1777-1788. PubMed ID: 38154531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlates With Computed Tomography for Glenoid Version Calculation Despite Lack of Visibility of Medial Scapula.
    Parada SA; Shaw KA; Antosh IJ; Eichinger JK; Li X; Curry EJ; Provencher MT
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Jan; 36(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 31864608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feasibility of using an inversion-recovery ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence for quantification of glenoid bone loss.
    Ma YJ; West J; Nazaran A; Cheng X; Hoenecke H; Du J; Chang EY
    Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Jul; 47(7):973-980. PubMed ID: 29396694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating Glenoid Width for Instability-Related Bone Loss: A CT Evaluation of an MRI Formula.
    Giles JW; Owens BD; Athwal GS
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Jul; 43(7):1726-30. PubMed ID: 25908112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Glenoid Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability: Superiority of Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography over Two-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Established Methodology.
    Weber AE; Bolia IK; Horn A; Villacis D; Omid R; Tibone JE; White E; Hatch GF
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(2):223-228. PubMed ID: 34094013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of Glenoid Bone Loss With 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Matched Computed Tomography Analysis.
    Vopat BG; Cai W; Torriani M; Vopat ML; Hemma M; Harris GJ; Schantz K; Provencher MT
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Dec; 34(12):3141-3147. PubMed ID: 30396796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of measurements performed on two dimensional and three dimensional computed tomography in glenoid assessment for instability.
    Kubicka AM; Stefaniak J; Lubiatowski P; Długosz J; Dzianach M; Redman M; Piontek J; Romanowski L
    Int Orthop; 2016 Dec; 40(12):2581-2588. PubMed ID: 27492723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of Agreement Between Computed Tomography Measurements of Glenoid Bone Defects in Anterior Shoulder Instability With and Without Comparison With the Contralateral Shoulder.
    Milano G; Saccomanno MF; Magarelli N; Bonomo L
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Dec; 43(12):2918-26. PubMed ID: 26473013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss Is Equivalent to 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Quantification: Cadaveric Study.
    Yanke AB; Shin JJ; Pearson I; Bach BR; Romeo AA; Cole BJ; Verma NN
    Arthroscopy; 2017 Apr; 33(4):709-715. PubMed ID: 27923707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Insufficient consensus regarding circle size and bone loss width using the ratio-"best fit circle"-method even with three-dimensional computed tomography.
    Lacheta L; Herbst E; Voss A; Braun S; Jungmann P; Millett PJ; Imhoff A; Martetschläger F
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Oct; 27(10):3222-3229. PubMed ID: 30725122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Scapula Tilt and Best-Fit Circle Placement When Measuring Glenoid Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability Patients.
    Moroder P; Plachel F; Huettner A; Ernstbrunner L; Minkus M; Boehm E; Gerhardt C; Scheibel M
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Feb; 34(2):398-404. PubMed ID: 29100772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Study on the evaluation of glenoid bone defects by MRI three-dimensional reconstruction].
    Zhang F; Xu L; Zhang B; Song S; Sheng X; Xiong W; Wang Z; Liao W; Zhang Q
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 May; 37(5):551-555. PubMed ID: 37190830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical Developments: Zero Echo Time Imaging of the Shoulder: Enhanced Osseous Detail by Using MR Imaging.
    Breighner RE; Endo Y; Konin GP; Gulotta LV; Koff MF; Potter HG
    Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):960-966. PubMed ID: 29117482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of computed tomography and 3D magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating glenohumeral instability bone loss.
    Lander ST; Liles JL; Kim BI; Taylor DC; Lau BC
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Nov; 31(11):2217-2224. PubMed ID: 35931334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3-D CT is the most reliable imaging modality when quantifying glenoid bone loss.
    Bishop JY; Jones GL; Rerko MA; Donaldson C;
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 471(4):1251-6. PubMed ID: 22996361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of glenoid bone loss and other osseous shoulder pathologies comparing MR-based CT-like images with conventional CT.
    Feuerriegel GC; Kronthaler S; Weiss K; Haller B; Leonhardt Y; Neumann J; Pfeiffer D; Hesse N; Erber B; Schwaiger BJ; Makowski MR; Woertler K; Karampinos DC; Wurm M; Gersing AS
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Dec; 33(12):8617-8626. PubMed ID: 37453986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Allows for Accurate Evaluation of Glenoid Bone Loss Compared With 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography.
    Lansdown DA; Cvetanovich GL; Verma NN; Cole BJ; Bach BR; Nicholson G; Romeo A; Dawe R; Yanke AB
    Arthroscopy; 2019 Mar; 35(3):734-740. PubMed ID: 30733040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter-observer agreement of CT measurement of the glenoid bone surface by the CT Pico method: Comparison with laser in a cadaveric model.
    De Filippo M; Saba L; Negrini G; Silva M; Pedrazzi G; Pogliacomi F; Castagna A
    Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Oct; 44(10):1491-7. PubMed ID: 26130069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability: reliability and accuracy of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional computed tomography measurement techniques.
    Bois AJ; Fening SD; Polster J; Jones MH; Miniaci A
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 Nov; 40(11):2569-77. PubMed ID: 23019250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.