These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32503040)

  • 1. Anatomic and functional asymmetries interactively shape human early visual cortex responses.
    Herde L; Uhl J; Rauss K
    J Vis; 2020 Jun; 20(6):3. PubMed ID: 32503040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional load modifies early activity in human primary visual cortex.
    Rauss KS; Pourtois G; Vuilleumier P; Schwartz S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 May; 30(5):1723-33. PubMed ID: 18711710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Earliest stages of visual cortical processing are not modified by attentional load.
    Ding Y; Martinez A; Qu Z; Hillyard SA
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Jul; 35(7):3008-24. PubMed ID: 25050422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parvocellular and magnocellular contributions to the initial generators of the visual evoked potential: high-density electrical mapping of the "C1" component.
    Foxe JJ; Strugstad EC; Sehatpour P; Molholm S; Pasieka W; Schroeder CE; McCourt ME
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep; 21(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 18784997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early retinotopic responses to violations of emotion-location associations may depend on conscious awareness.
    Herde L; Rossi V; Pourtois G; Rauss K
    Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):38-55. PubMed ID: 28580835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retinotopically specific effects of attention on human early visual cortex activity.
    Herde L; Schönauer-Firle M; Rauss K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Aug; 48(8):856-870. PubMed ID: 35708935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of temporal predictability on exogenous attentional modulation of feedforward processing in the striate cortex.
    Dassanayake TL; Michie PT; Fulham R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jul; 105():9-16. PubMed ID: 27114044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual omitted stimulus potentials are not retinotopic.
    Ishida T; Nittono H
    Neurosci Lett; 2024 May; 830():137777. PubMed ID: 38621505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial summation revealed in the earliest visual evoked component C1 and the effect of attention on its linearity.
    Chen J; Yu Q; Zhu Z; Peng Y; Fang F
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 115(1):500-9. PubMed ID: 26561595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positive emotion broadens attention focus through decreased position-specific spatial encoding in early visual cortex: evidence from ERPs.
    Vanlessen N; Rossi V; De Raedt R; Pourtois G
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2013 Mar; 13(1):60-79. PubMed ID: 23090718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Stimulus Size and Contrast on the Initial Primary Visual Cortical Response in Humans.
    Gebodh N; Vanegas MI; Kelly SP
    Brain Topogr; 2017 Jul; 30(4):450-460. PubMed ID: 28474167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Homeostatic plasticity in human extrastriate cortex following a simulated peripheral scotoma.
    Gannon MA; Long SM; Parks NA
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3391-3401. PubMed ID: 28821922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generation of the VESPA response to rapid contrast fluctuations is dominated by striate cortex: evidence from retinotopic mapping.
    Lalor EC; Kelly SP; Foxe JJ
    Neuroscience; 2012 Aug; 218():226-34. PubMed ID: 22683721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Slow fluctuations in attentional control of sensory cortex.
    Kam JW; Dao E; Farley J; Fitzpatrick K; Smallwood J; Schooler JW; Handy TC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 23(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 20146593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does spatial attention modulate the earliest component of the visual evoked potential?
    Baumgartner HM; Graulty CJ; Hillyard SA; Pitts MA
    Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):4-19. PubMed ID: 28534668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of opposing lateral visuospatial asymmetries in the upper and lower visual fields.
    Loughnane GM; Shanley JP; Lalor EC; O'Connell RG
    Cortex; 2015 Feb; 63():220-31. PubMed ID: 25282061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional MRI and EEG Index Complementary Attentional Modulations.
    Itthipuripat S; Sprague TC; Serences JT
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 39(31):6162-6179. PubMed ID: 31127004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The experimental parameters that affect attentional modulation of the ERP C1 component.
    Slotnick SD
    Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):53-62. PubMed ID: 28826303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vertical asymmetries and inhibition of return: effects of spatial and non-spatial cueing on behavior and visual ERPs.
    Gutiérrez-Domínguez FJ; Pazo-Álvarez P; Doallo S; Fuentes LJ; Lorenzo-López L; Amenedo E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Feb; 91(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 24342058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERP signs of categorical and supra-categorical processing of visual information.
    Zani A; Marsili G; Senerchia A; Orlandi A; Citron FM; Rizzi E; Proverbio AM
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():90-107. PubMed ID: 25447739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.