These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32503567)
1. The step further smile virtual planning: milled versus prototyped mock-ups for the evaluation of the designed smile characteristics. Lo Giudice A; Ortensi L; Farronato M; Lucchese A; Lo Castro E; Isola G BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):165. PubMed ID: 32503567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Milled versus moulded mock-ups based on the superimposition of 3D meshes from digital oral impressions: a comparative in vitro study in the aesthetic area. Cattoni F; Teté G; Calloni AM; Manazza F; Gastaldi G; Capparè P BMC Oral Health; 2019 Oct; 19(1):230. PubMed ID: 31664999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of trial restorations from virtual planning: A comparison of two fabrication techniques. Ortensi L; Lo Castro E; Rapisarda E; Pedullà E J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):425-429. PubMed ID: 33317829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness. Kalberer N; Mehl A; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):637-643. PubMed ID: 30711292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Smile Design and Treatment Planning-Conventional versus Digital-A Pilot Study. Chisnoiu AM; Staicu AC; Kui A; Chisnoiu RM; Iacob S; Fluerașu M; Buduru S J Pers Med; 2023 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37511641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of manufacturing technologies on the surface accuracy of CAD-CAM occlusal splints. Orgev A; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):697-705. PubMed ID: 36227731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advanced digital planning approach using a 3D-printed mock-up. A case report. Santi MR; Nastri VHT; Lins RBE Int J Esthet Dent; 2024 May; 19(2):186-194. PubMed ID: 38726859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intaglio surface trueness of milled and 3D-printed digital maxillary and mandibular dentures: A clinical study. Lo Russo L; Guida L; Zhurakivska K; Troiano G; Chochlidakis K; Ercoli C J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):131-139. PubMed ID: 34116839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital smile planning technique applied to prosthetic rehabilitation of dental esthetic area: a case report. Rebba B; Merlone A; Cantile N; Manazza F; Cattoni F J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2021; 35(4 Suppl. 1):1-9. PubMed ID: 34425656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trueness, 3D Deviation, Time and Cost Comparisons Between Milled and 3D-Printed Resin Single Crowns. No-Cortes J; Ayres AP; Lima JF; Markarian RA; Attard NJ; Cortes ARG Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2022 May; 30(2):107-112. PubMed ID: 34304395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trueness and precision of 3D-printed versus milled monolithic zirconia crowns: An in vitro study. Lerner H; Nagy K; Pranno N; Zarone F; Admakin O; Mangano F J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103792. PubMed ID: 34481929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Dimensional Changes Between CAD-CAM Milled Complete Denture Bases and 3D Printed Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Study. Helal MA; Abdelrahim RA; Zeidan AAE J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(S1):11-19. PubMed ID: 35524633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CAD-CAM removable complete dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trueness of fit, biocompatibility, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, color stability, time-cost analysis, clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Srinivasan M; Kamnoedboon P; McKenna G; Angst L; Schimmel M; Özcan M; Müller F J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103777. PubMed ID: 34400250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Digital smile design and anterior monolithic restorations chair side fabrication with Cerec Cad/Cam system]. Perez-Davidi M Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2015 Oct; 32(4):15-9, 25. PubMed ID: 26727845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of orthodontic models prototyped for clear aligners therapy: A 3D imaging analysis comparing different market segments 3D printing protocols. Venezia P; Ronsivalle V; Rustico L; Barbato E; Leonardi R; Lo Giudice A J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104212. PubMed ID: 35792192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The occlusal precision of milled versus printed provisional crowns. Giannetti L; Apponi R; Mordini L; Presti S; Breschi L; Mintrone F J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103924. PubMed ID: 34910962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Digital protocol for comprehensive planning of dental treatment. Clinical case analysis]. Apresyan SV; Stepanov AG; Vardanyan BA Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2021; 100(3):65-71. PubMed ID: 34180628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virtual Evaluation of the Accuracy of Fit and Trueness in Maxillary Poly(etheretherketone) Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated by Direct and Indirect CAD/CAM Techniques. Negm EE; Aboutaleb FA; Alam-Eldein AM J Prosthodont; 2019 Aug; 28(7):804-810. PubMed ID: 31106495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Duplication Techniques on the Fitting Accuracy of CAD-CAM Milled, 3D-Printed, and Injection-Molded Mandibular Complete Denture Bases. Emam AM; El-Esawy AA; Alyami MH; Baraka Y; Gad MM; Helal MA Dent J (Basel); 2024 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 38392236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]