These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32504858)
1. What do cows drink? A systems factorial technology account of processing architecture in memory intersection problems. Howard ZL; Belevski B; Eidels A; Dennis S Cognition; 2020 Sep; 202():104294. PubMed ID: 32504858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Information-processing architectures in multidimensional classification: a validation test of the systems factorial technology. Fific M; Nosofsky RM; Townsend JT J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):356-75. PubMed ID: 18377176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rat spatial memory tasks adapted for humans: characterization in subjects with intact brain and subjects with selective medial temporal lobe thermal lesions. Bohbot VD; Jech R; Růzicka E; Nadel L; Kalina M; Stepánková K; Bures J Physiol Res; 2002; 51 Suppl 1():S49-65. PubMed ID: 12479786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Verbal Learning and Memory in Early-Implanted, Prelingually Deaf Adolescent and Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Chandramouli SH; Kronenberger WG; Pisoni DB J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1033-1050. PubMed ID: 30986141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age-related differences in recall and recognition: a meta-analysis. Rhodes S; Greene NR; Naveh-Benjamin M Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1529-1547. PubMed ID: 31396816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spontaneous memory retrieval varies based on familiarity with a spatial context. Robin J; Garzon L; Moscovitch M Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():81-92. PubMed ID: 31034970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neutral details associated with emotional events are encoded: evidence from a cued recall paradigm. Mickley Steinmetz KR; Knight AG; Kensinger EA Cogn Emot; 2016 Nov; 30(7):1352-60. PubMed ID: 26220708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Information and processes underlying semantic and episodic memory across tasks, items, and individuals. Cox GE; Hemmer P; Aue WR; Criss AH J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Apr; 147(4):545-590. PubMed ID: 29698028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Studying visual search using systems factorial methodology with target-distractor similarity as the factor. Fifić M; Townsend JT; Eidels A Percept Psychophys; 2008 May; 70(4):583-603. PubMed ID: 18556921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Priming recognition memory test cues: No evidence for an attributional basis of recollection. Ionita CF; Talmi D; Taylor JR Behav Brain Sci; 2020 Jan; 42():e289. PubMed ID: 31896359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence that within-dimension features are generally processed coactively. Blunden AG; Howe PDL; Little DR Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):193-227. PubMed ID: 31254263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental dissociations between memory measures: influence of retrieval strategies. Willems S; Van der Linden M Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 19010060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task. Shaw RJ; Craik FI Psychol Aging; 1989 Jun; 4(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 2789740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reinstatement of odour context cues veridical memories but not false memories. Tamminen J; Mebude M Memory; 2019 Apr; 27(4):575-579. PubMed ID: 30138046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]