These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3250578)

  • 1. A study to compare the overall performance of two hydrocolloid dressings on partial thickness wounds.
    Watts C; Shipes E
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1988; 21():28-31. PubMed ID: 3250578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
    Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
    Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
    Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of three new hydrocolloid dressings: retention of dressing integrity and biodegradability of absorbent components attenuate inflammation.
    Chakravarthy D; Rodway N; Schmidt S; Smith D; Evancho M; Sims R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Oct; 28(10):1165-73. PubMed ID: 7530252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of wound dressings on full-thickness wounds in micropigs.
    Gokoo C; Burhop K
    Decubitus; 1993 Sep; 6(5):42-3, 46, 48 passim. PubMed ID: 8286020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing a foam composite to a hydrocellular foam dressing in the management of venous leg ulcers: a controlled clinical study.
    Vanscheidt W; Sibbald RG; Eager CA
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2004 Nov; 50(11):42-55. PubMed ID: 15545697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Full-thickness pressure ulcers: patient and wound healing characteristics.
    van Rijswijk L
    Decubitus; 1993 Jan; 6(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 8427640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
    Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Management of leg ulcers with hydrocolloid occlusive dressing.
    Friedman SJ; Su WP
    Arch Dermatol; 1984 Oct; 120(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 6486846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Managing sacral pressure ulcers with hydrocolloid dressings: results of a controlled, clinical study.
    Day A; Dombranski S; Farkas C; Foster C; Godin J; Moody M; Morrison M; Tamer C
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Mar; 41(2):52-4, 56, 58 passim. PubMed ID: 7598778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
    Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.
    Seeley J; Jensen JL; Hutcherson J
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):39-44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10655861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical experience with an antimicrobial hydrogel dressing on recalcitrant wounds.
    Wood L; Wood Z; Davis P; Wilkins J
    J Wound Care; 2010 Jul; 19(7):287-8, 290-3. PubMed ID: 20616771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of a normothermic dressing on pressure ulcer healing.
    Kloth LC; Berman JE; Dumit-Minkel S; Sutton CH; Papanek PE; Wurzel J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 11074989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of three occlusive dressings in the treatment of full-thickness wounds in pigs.
    Agren MS; Mertz PM; Franzén L
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1997 Jan; 36(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 8996261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of three occlusive dressing materials on healing of full-thickness skin wounds in dogs.
    Ramsey DT; Pope ER; Wagner-Mann C; Berg JN; Swaim SF
    Am J Vet Res; 1995 Jul; 56(7):941-9. PubMed ID: 7574165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simplifying modern wound management for nonprofessional caregivers.
    Seaman S; Herbster S; Muglia J; Murray M; Rick C
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Aug; 46(8):18-27. PubMed ID: 11189544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A polyurethane dressing is beneficial for split-thickness skin-graft donor wound healing.
    Akita S; Akino K; Imaizumi T; Tanaka K; Anraku K; Yano H; Hirano A
    Burns; 2006 Jun; 32(4):447-51. PubMed ID: 16621321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [New therapeutic strategies for the treatment of difficult wounds].
    Onesti MG; Bitonti A; Fino P; Ciotti M; Scuderi N
    G Chir; 2008 May; 29(5):212-20. PubMed ID: 18507956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Experimental in vitro evaluation of the absorption capacity and control of exudate of 3 wound healing dressings].
    Torra i Bou JE; Cortés i Borra A; Manresa i Domínguez JM
    Rev Enferm; 1998 Oct; 21(242):suppl 2-8. PubMed ID: 10030154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.